|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
366
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
I try to keep myself calm, but this is just way too outrageous that I had to vent here again and again.
You, CCP, make it sound as if ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt is only available contingent upon the purchase of 13 X PLEXs several months ago. I didn't have to, but I took the damn bait, with the expectation that CCP and its honest marketing department will maintain the "uniqueness" and rarity of these special items.
But you decide to reward those who took that "extra leap of faith" by treating us like ***** and dingleberries and having these same items available for 50 cents each, then I don't see the fairness in all this.
CCP, You should have MADE IT ADAMANTLY CLEAR FROM THE BEGINNING THAT AFTER 6 MONTHS, THESE SPECIAL ITEMS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR 50 CENTS EACH!
CCP should make reparation by rewarding the ISHUKONE SPECIAL SHIRT owners with other equivalent UNIQUE items.
Prior to this debacle, the shirt had a market value of approximately 1.2-1.3B. Now, it costs 11 million to purchase.
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
366
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:I can see why you are outraged - but in comparison to some very real game mechanics hosed by the 1.1 patch (ie wardec system) this is just small beer. Probably best to file it under "lol I invested in aurum/Nex and got taken to the cleaners" and move on with your life tbh.
I know it is a small issue relative to other big changes, but I am just venting out because actual money was involved in this damn scheme.
If CCP decided to reissue Fullerene Shards or Cerebral Slices from current missions, I wouldn't have the same reaction.
In this case, there are dozens of people (investors?) who spent actual CASH to receive the "much anticipated" Ishukone Special Edition shirt. What is even more outrageous that we could've gotten the shirt for merely 50 cents if we waited for half a year!
13 x PLEX deal costed more than $230. I know that what we paid is for PLEXs, but in its initial marketing promotion, CCP made it sound as if the shirt was only obtainable via the specified venue.
This is just not acceptable. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
366
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Danfen Fenix wrote:Wow, do you react like this with every price change in your life? How do you ever go shopping ? 
Yea, how would you react if you decide to purchase that pretty Mercedes E350 of yours for $48,000 and realize that the same dealership is selling that car for $1,000, 6 months later?
I wouldn't care if it was just an ingame item obtainable solely through ingame activities. This is an issue where actual cash is involved. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
366
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:So what you're saying is, that investing in virtual goods owned by a corporation you have no control over might not be a wise move. I can see why you're upset and hope CCP doesn't make a habit of making special edition items common, but I just can't get that upset with you over a shirt especially, since the shirt was a bonus gift given on top of a normal purchase of a PLEX packet. 
You have valid point, but once again, not everyone thinks alike. If you examine the initial marketing promotion, CCP made it sound as if this is only obtainable via this special bundle, as a one-time offer. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
366
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
Danfen Fenix wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Danfen Fenix wrote:Wow, do you react like this with every price change in your life? How do you ever go shopping ?  Yea, how would you react if you decide to purchase that pretty Mercedes E350 of yours for $48,000 and realize that the same dealership is selling that car for $1,000, 6 months later? I wouldn't care if it was just an ingame item obtainable solely through ingame activities. This is an issue where actual cash is involved. I would suck it up. Not like theres anything I could do about it, and the dealership wouldn't be obliged to do anything, so why bother ranting?
Even those who are FAR RICHER than me with significantly more disposable income, would see the unfairness in this practice. I know what's done is done, but what I need is CCP's reassurance that they will be clear about their marketing procedures in the future. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
366
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Funny how it wasn't obvious for you that this will happen.
Do you also go into a shop for computer parts, buy the new and overpriced stuff and then complain a month later because it's worth only half anymore ?
*shakeshead*
You are not special. You never were. You have the same value as everybody else. None.
You bought it for reasons you probably don't even understand yourself and now you're complaining about not being part of a small "special" group anymore.
RealityCheck:
You never were special. You never will be special.
You didn't even see it coming. You fell for the oldest trick in the book.
It was obvious.
Blame yourself.
Obviously you failed ANALOGY section of the SAT exam. What you wrote there, has NOTHING TO DO with what we are going through. Do not try to preach me about my lack of understanding in economics when you are still struggling from the daily hardship of community college life.
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
366
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Danfen Fenix wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Destination SkillQueue wrote:So what you're saying is, that investing in virtual goods owned by a corporation you have no control over might not be a wise move. I can see why you're upset and hope CCP doesn't make a habit of making special edition items common, but I just can't get that upset with you over a shirt especially, since the shirt was a bonus gift given on top of a normal purchase of a PLEX packet.  You have valid point, but once again, not everyone thinks alike. If you examine the initial marketing promotion, CCP made it sound as if this is only obtainable via this special bundle, as a one-time offer. It was only obtainable via the special off.....at the time. It's like when a new movie comes out & it's stated to only be available at cinemas/theaters. A few months later the DVD comes out. Or, another recent trend in gaming, when you get special in game items/perks etc for purchasing the collectors edition, then said items are made available later on for MT.
Could you try to examine other "unique" items. Please take a look at the Alliance Tournament prize section. It never says ANYTHING about the indefinite rarity of those ships, but people take it for granted that these will be "unique" till the end of EVE Online.
Why shouldn't CCP apply that to these other unique promotional items? Except this, actual cash was involved.
If CCP is willing to reissue these promotional items for 1/100th the initial market value, then CCP should do the same for ALL OTHER UNIQUES including:
Silver Magnate Gold Magnate Opux Luxury Yacht Tempest Tribal Issue Imperial Issue Armageddon All ALLIANCE TOURNAMENT SHIPS Guardian-Vexor Federation Issue Magathron.
Why show selectivity? This is not fair. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
367
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Obviously you failed ANALOGY section of the SAT exam. GǪsays the guy who confuses a free promotional item with the actual good being bought in his car-buying analogy. 
Obviously, I am dramatizing my points so that I can convey my thinking to the poster. I am not trying to espouse the fact that the shirts are equivalent to other tangible luxury items. What i am trying to convey here is the "almost-cryptic-deceptive" marketing practices shown by CCP. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
367
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Obviously you failed ANALOGY section of the SAT exam. What you wrote there, has NOTHING TO DO with what we are going through. Do not try to preach me about my lack of understanding in economics when you are still struggling from the daily hardship of community college life.
Bullcrap. Not only am i not an american, i wasn't talking about economics at all. It's not about the money. It's about the item and the loss of it's rareness. You're from the US ? That would be fitting.
That is part of economics, my community college friend. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
367
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
Danfen Fenix wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:but people take it for granted . Singled out the most important part. Yes, people take it for granted. That is no ones fault but their own. CCP may reissue the other ships etc at a later time. They may not. Last I checked the ships from this christmas just gone were reissued ones themselves, correct?
And hence, by pathetic attempt, to convey our displeasure. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
367
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
Martil wrote:I don't think I'd spend $230 on a t-shirt even in real life.
There are those who spend $650 7-course meal at the Fat Duck while there are those who spend $6.50 for All Countries Buffet. Everyone values things differently. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
367
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
Martil wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Martil wrote:I don't think I'd spend $230 on a t-shirt even in real life. There are those who spend $650 7-course meal at the Fat Duck while there are those who spend $6.50 for All Countries Buffet. Everyone values things differently. They both wind up the same place. Seems it just takes longer for internet shirts.
Hahahahahaha good one. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 17:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
Noriko Satomi wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:You have valid point, but once again, not everyone thinks alike... Yes, some people think clearly. Feel free to Occupy This Thread! and demand two more free shirts for the other avatars on your account.
I know i look pathetic asking for reparation for ingame items, but still, CCP needs to be absolutely clear about its future promotions. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
Doc Mulder wrote:I think it's funny.
Just like 30 years ago when my buddy bought an 8088 PC for $5 Grand...and 6 months later it could be had for $900.00. I laughed at him too...
I think it's funny too.
What you say has nothing to do with our issue. We are not talking about the obsolescence of an item or the decrease in price because of increase in supply. We are talking about CCP's "almost-cryptic-deceptive" marketing practice that incentivize us to dish out hundreds of dollars by making it sound as if this unique collectible item is obtainable contingent upon paying actual cash, when 6 months down the road, they resell it for 50 cents each. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:hahahaha get owned
hahaha yes still continue to talk like a 5-year old middle school drop-out. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:06:00 -
[16] - Quote
Opodiphthera Eucalypti Lepdoptera wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Doc Mulder wrote:I think it's funny.
Just like 30 years ago when my buddy bought an 8088 PC for $5 Grand...and 6 months later it could be had for $900.00. I laughed at him too... I think it's funny too. What you say has nothing to do with our issue. We are not talking about the obsolescence of an item or the decrease in price because of increase in supply. We are talking about CCP's "almost-cryptic-deceptive" marketing practice that incentivize us to dish out hundreds of dollars by making it sound as if this unique collectible item is obtainable contingent upon paying actual cash, when 6 months down the road, they resell it for 50 cents each. Read that with attention folks, he didn't bough the Plex, he bought the digital shirt.
Yes, I bought PLEXs to get the damn shirt. I don't see anything wrong with that. I am spending what I earned. Some spend it on hookers and enjoy a colorful concoction of STDs and Herpies. I spend it on nerdy items. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
Opodiphthera Eucalypti Lepdoptera wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Opodiphthera Eucalypti Lepdoptera wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Doc Mulder wrote:I think it's funny.
Just like 30 years ago when my buddy bought an 8088 PC for $5 Grand...and 6 months later it could be had for $900.00. I laughed at him too... I think it's funny too. What you say has nothing to do with our issue. We are not talking about the obsolescence of an item or the decrease in price because of increase in supply. We are talking about CCP's "almost-cryptic-deceptive" marketing practice that incentivize us to dish out hundreds of dollars by making it sound as if this unique collectible item is obtainable contingent upon paying actual cash, when 6 months down the road, they resell it for 50 cents each. Read that with attention folks, he didn't bough the Plex, he bought the digital shirt. Yes, I bought PLEXs to get the damn shirt. I don't see anything wrong with that. I am spending what I earned. Some spend it on hookers and enjoy a colorful concoction of STDs and Herpies. I spend it on nerdy items. The Plex was not worth the cash? EDIT: I'm confused.
No. I had no immediate use for 39 x PLEXs. The cost includes postponement of spending on other alternatives/earning interests from real investments. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:12:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ghost Xray wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:hahahaha get owned hahaha yes still continue to talk like a 15-year old middle school drop-out. I like all your personal insults have something to do with school. Can you characterize me as a "dirty drunk sorority ****" next?
No. I never belittled anyone until I get insulted. Everyone has different styles of insulting others. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:23:00 -
[19] - Quote
Bootleg Jack wrote:It went on sale later, it happens IRL in almost all cases as the newer stuff comes out the old goes on sale.
Mass production sets in and prices drop, the $100,000 status symbols of today are the Walmart specials of tomorrow.
/thread
Once again, what you say has nothing to do with my issue. What you describe is an obsolescence of an item & depreciating in price due to increase supply. That does not apply for Ishukone Special Edition shirt.
I am outraged because of CCP's cryptic marketing practices. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:26:00 -
[20] - Quote
Opodiphthera Eucalypti Lepdoptera wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: No. I had no immediate use for 39 x PLEXs. The cost includes postponement of spending on other alternatives/earning interests from real investments.
But you still got the PLEX. They are worth the same in terms of game time wich is what they are meant for. And if you paid for exclusivity you had it, for 6 months. I personally don't understand this logic since we are far into the industrial age. No matter what anyone says, no product is unique, even less a digital product.
When Ishukone Special Edition shirt was initially advertised, the site made it sound as if purchasing 13 x PLEXs is the only viable venue to obtain the special shirt. I did get 13 x PLEXs, but the main driver of me having to purchase the PLEXs was to obtain that special shirt. So we can't just easily dismiss the shirt as a "oh it was a bonus item. you shouldn't complain." It's not that simple.
Once again, if CCP was clear from the beginning about how the shirt will be sold for $0.50 cents in the future, even an impulsive nerdy ingame item lover like me, wouldn't have gone through that damn bundle deal. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:27:00 -
[21] - Quote
Eternal Error wrote:You spent around 200$ on a virtual t-shirt and got taken out behind the woodshed. I fail to see the problem here.
Funny thing here is that I would've purchased many more alike items if CCP kept it truly unique and exclusive as it initially advertised.
Everyone values things differently. Do not forget that. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
368
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:38:00 -
[22] - Quote
Eternal Error wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Eternal Error wrote:You spent around 200$ on a virtual t-shirt and got taken out behind the woodshed. I fail to see the problem here. Funny thing here is that I would've purchased many more alike items if CCP kept it truly unique and exclusive as it initially advertised. Everyone values things differently. Do not forget that. Exactly. You valued it enough to spend 13 PLEX on it so that you could have a "unique" item (with no guarantee of its continued uniqueness) for as long as the Eve Online servers were running. At no time did they explicitly state that it would always cost that much (note: if they did, I apologize, and you should raise hell, but you seem to have no proof of this). Clearly, you valued that shirt at around 200$ using the information you were given at the time. Price drops happen all the time on all sorts of item, and anyone with an IQ above that of your average bacteria knew that prices on most gear would eventually drop. Therefore, there is no problem here, and this thread sucks.
Once again, as I mentioned again and again, what you say has nothing to do with my issue. "prices on most gear would eventually drop" only applies to items that are susceptible to market forces including change in supplies or the availability of the next best alternatives.
What we have here, Ishukone Special Edition Shirt, was advertised by CCP as if purchasing 13 x PLEX was the sole venue to obtain the item. Also, we all knew that it was a one-time event since it did specify "special one-time offer" so I don't see why I shouldn't be outraged at CCP when they decided to reissue the shirt for $0.50 cents. Before you go on insulting me about my IQ and telling me how my thread sucks, you should study more about economics. It could be a powerful tool for you in the future. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
370
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:45:00 -
[23] - Quote
Opodiphthera Eucalypti Lepdoptera wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Opodiphthera Eucalypti Lepdoptera wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: No. I had no immediate use for 39 x PLEXs. The cost includes postponement of spending on other alternatives/earning interests from real investments.
But you still got the PLEX. They are worth the same in terms of game time wich is what they are meant for. And if you paid for exclusivity you had it, for 6 months. I personally don't understand this logic since we are far into the industrial age. No matter what anyone says, no product is unique, even less a digital product. When Ishukone Special Edition shirt was initially advertised, the site made it sound as if purchasing 13 x PLEXs is the only viable venue to obtain the special shirt. I did get 13 x PLEXs, but the main driver of me having to purchase the PLEXs was to obtain that special shirt. So we can't just easily dismiss the shirt as a "oh it was a bonus item. you shouldn't complain." It's not that simple. Once again, if CCP was clear from the beginning about how the shirt will be sold for $0.50 cents in the future, even an impulsive nerdy ingame item lover like me, wouldn't have gone through that damn bundle deal. I don't think CCP knew they would have to sell it cheap. Their intended consumers refuse to buy any digital item that costed more than material items so they had to change. Maybe you should reconsider your values. Now THAT is not simple, but people do it all the time.
I will certainly "reconsider my value" once CCP acknowledges its mishap and be more clear about its future promotions. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
370
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 18:47:00 -
[24] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Once again, as I mentioned again and again, what you say has nothing to do with my issue. "prices on most gear would eventually drop" only applies to items that are susceptible to market forces including change in supplies or the availability of the next best alternatives. It has everything to do with your issue because it's exactly what happened: the item in question is susceptible to market forces, in particular a change in supplies and availability. Quote:Also, we all knew that it was a one-time event since it did specify "special one-time offer" And it was. It still is. So far, it's the only time that shirt has been offered for free with a PLEX bundle. Now, there's a new offer where you actually have to pay for the item itself. Again, you're complaining that your free novelty key chain is also available at the store and spending money on a product just to get the side-offers is just as foolish as it has been for the last, oh, 150 years or so.
Now you are playing wording games here. When a simple player with mediocre intellect reads a message that says "one-time offer & special edition & only," he/she could logically assume that this item is disseminated only on a definite basis and will maintain its value as collectible item.
Until last year's Christmas debacle with the reissuance of old historical frigates, CCP performed extremely well on keeping its purported exclusive items, truly "exclusive" for 7 amazing years. Magnates, GV, Tourney Prices, Annual Frigates, Collectors' Edition Shuttle, and all other special promotional/ingame activity items remained truly unique. It was only RECENTLY that CCP decided to reuse the old historical items. Obviously a miscommunication between the marketing department or a change in personnel (of course, I am being speculative here).
What I am asking here is a simple acknowledgement by CCP that they will be more clear about their marketing practices. Having spent unnecessary $, some kind of reparation for the previous spenders would be only "fair." |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
370
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 19:09:00 -
[25] - Quote
Celeste Taylor wrote:I realize many people out there don't see things this way, but here is my take on the situation.
Even though I was directly effected by last night's price drops I am still happy with the new pricing. My philosophy is to not spend more on an item than what you believe it is worth to you. For me that bar is set pretty high for apparel items, although not as high as CCP's original AUR prices. My personal opinion is in general it is dangerous to buy something based off of perceived rareness and potential value and you shouldn't buy something that you feel is overpriced.
Given that theory I do not feel like the money I spent on the Executor Red/Gold or the re-issued shoes was a waste, since I intend on keeping them and did not mind spending the money to get them. On the other hand I bought the ten new apparel items released today for the same price as my Executor once cost. Had CCP released the new items at 3000-4000 AUR each there would have been no way I could have bought the complete set.
I do think that it would have been a bit wiser for CCP to release a new color (like the Quafe shirt, which I don't think would have been difficult) which would have also increased the available inventory, and keep people from getting upset.
I suppose that there is the other side of the coin with the I have something you will never have mentality, but I personally never cared for the divide between the haves and the have nots. I like to buy things that I like, instead of buying things that are rare and cost a ton, although there is sadly often a correlation between the two. That 500m ISK coat is still worth 500m, and if that isn't true to others perhaps they shouldn't have spent that much for it.
What you say is absolutely valid as well.
I am not espousing for maintaining this "great wall" between the haves and have-nots. I am just asking CCP to be more clear about its deceptive marketing practices because I wouldn't have wasted hundreds of dollars on "early PLEX purchase" when i could've simply go on with my real-life for 6 months, come back to EVE, and buy that same item for $0.50!
I am just asking CCP to be CLEAR. And of course, for the sake of fairness, some kind of reparation for the previous collectors, is just. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
370
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 19:35:00 -
[26] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Flakey Foont wrote:At least the Mercedes is real. Once upon a time there was a British car manufacturer that went by the name of Jaquar. One dark day the evil car manufacturer Ford purchased Jaquar, and in a mighty uproar thousands of loyal Jaquar owners all cried at once "this is unexceptable! Our lovely overpriced luxury cars won't be worth anything because ford is going to produce a cheaper model car under the Jaquar name!" Ford did. The rest of the world could care less; very much like the OP's problem.
Nice speech there, but everyone values things differently. You might not care. Most likely, many others don't care about my issue. But there are certainly a few who cares deeply about this issue. I wouldn't just discount this issue right away. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
371
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 19:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Flakey Foont wrote:At least the Mercedes is real. Once upon a time there was a British car manufacturer that went by the name of Jaquar. One dark day the evil car manufacturer Ford purchased Jaquar, and in a mighty uproar thousands of loyal Jaquar owners all cried at once "this is unexceptable! Our lovely overpriced luxury cars won't be worth anything because ford is going to produce a cheaper model car under the Jaquar name!" Ford did. The rest of the world could care less; very much like the OP's problem.
And your small summary is very misleading. The cae of the Ford's acquisition of Jaguar had huge implications for millions of shareholders and certainly for the outcome of other similar mergers and acquisitions. You can't just say "the world does not care" because you don't care. Oh wait... that's the usual "goons mentality," right? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
371
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 19:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cloned S0ul wrote:I agree with op, i buy this shirt for my main one hour ago for 500 arum, i know it was rare and expensive before Actually, it was rare and free before. It didn't cost any AUR and as such, no AUR should (or indeed could) be reimbursed. 
But those items were advertised as if obtaining the items was contingent upon the purchase of either EVE Online Russian Collector's Edition, 13 X Plexs, or "blank." The value came from exclusivity and there are people who took additional risk and actual cash to obtain these exclusive collectible items. You can't just ignore that. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
371
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 19:44:00 -
[29] - Quote
MinefieldS wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Danfen Fenix wrote:Wow, do you react like this with every price change in your life? How do you ever go shopping ?  Yea, how would you react if you decide to purchase that pretty Mercedes E350 of yours for $48,000 and realize that the same dealership is selling that car for $1,000, 6 months later? I wouldn't care if it was just an ingame item obtainable solely through ingame activities. This is an issue where actual cash is involved. I once bought an item for $70, only to find out that the price dropped to $55 the next day. The retailer wouldn't refund me $15 so I returned the item for a refund and ordered another one. I got what I wanted and the retailer lost more money on shipping.
Once again, what you describe here has nothing to do with my issue. Thanks for your story though. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
386
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 06:16:00 -
[30] - Quote
Dirk Culliford wrote:So, OP, from your own post said shirt was worth 1.2b. You could therefore have acquired it for 3 plex, with some isk left over.
Either
- You actually kind of wanted 13 plex anyway, which shoots down your own argument of "I only bought them for the shirt"
or
- You failed at economics lesson 1
This point is unrelated to the other valid points already presented relating to whining about the free toy that came in your cereal when all you paid for was cereal.
Obviously you have not examined the initial offer proposed by the great CCP marketing department. When it held the special sale of 13 X Plex for the shirt promotion, it made it sound as if the purchase of the 13 x PLEX was the only viable venue for anyone to obtain the shirt. Similar to the Interbus Shuttle handed out along with the actual copy of the EVE Online client, I figured it would make a terrific investment and a sound collectible.
If more people purchased 13 X PLEXs and the price of the shirt decreased due to the increase in the supply, I have no grudge against it. But the problem here is that CCP "artificially" increased the supply of the Ishukone Special Edition Shirt, thereby, making the initial investment worthless. There are also those who purchase the shirt for 1.1B-1.4B with logical expectation that under no circumstances, would CCP make a direct interference on the market.
CCP nerfs and do funny stuff in the market often times. They might change the venue of rare ores and have the prices increase by 10%~50% and vice versa. But as for the ISHUKONE SPECIAL SHIRT, CCP, without any warning, lowered the market price from 1.1B-1.4B to 0.001B in a matter of 3 seconds.
You claim that I failed Economics 101? Having collected rare items for the past several years, I assure you that i have increased my net worth MANY TIMES over whatever meager amount you have. This is not the failure or the lack of my economics knowledge. It is the failure of the CCP to provide a clear explanation prior to making market disruptions.
Trust me, if CCP said these shirts will be available for meager $0.50 cents, I wouldn't have bothered with purchasing 13 X PLEXs. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 16:09:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alaura Aquila wrote:Dheeradj Esil wrote:So.... OP bought 13 PLEX, and got a free shirt with it..... Now the shirt is released to the general public, and he complains that he didn't cash it in earlier?
Brb, buying the shirt from some leftover AUR from the EVE Is Real shizzle! Is that what this is about? If so, the OP doesn't have a leg to stand on. I could see his point if it was a special item to commemorate an event like Fanfest (Quafe shirt or Quafe Iteron), a free bonus item for buying more plex hardly constitutes anything special.
Once again, if you have ever examined the wordings and the marketing gimmick that CCP used to advertise this deal where the ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt was issued, a person of mediocre intellect could've assumed that when reading the terms including "one-time offer," "special edition," "one-time only," one could have surely assumed that this was indeed, literally, a one-tine opportunity to acquire this highly collectible shirts. You are absolutely true that the shirt did not cost $260, but CCP surely used a "tie-in contract" to incentivize folks with additional disposable income, to dish out cash for PLEXs, by offering this purported unique items.
You claim that "I got 13 X PLEXs so I should not whine about it" That's not entirely true. Because of CCP's deceptive and ambiguous marketing scheme, many of us were compelled to purchase 13 X PLEXS with the expectation that CCP will hold these wordings including "one-time offer" true for the Shirt. You say we did not incur any costs because we got our PLEXs. There are costs to every transactions and we have incurred more costs than the price of PLEXs themselves. The postponement of purchase for other goods is one. The possibility of having to invest the $260 for additional interest rate is another. There was absolutely no reason for me to purchase 13 X PLEXs all at once, but I did so, because of the compelling and deceptive marketing tactic used my CCP.
What I am asking here, is a simple Dev response that pretty much provides explanation for their odd, cryptic, and deceptive marketing practices.
As mentioned by hundreds of commentators, I understand that I got "****** in every conceivable holes" by CCP.
CCP should provide us with clear message so that this kind of bullshit doesn't happen again. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 17:55:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Alaura Aquila wrote:Dheeradj Esil wrote:So.... OP bought 13 PLEX, and got a free shirt with it..... Now the shirt is released to the general public, and he complains that he didn't cash it in earlier?
Brb, buying the shirt from some leftover AUR from the EVE Is Real shizzle! Is that what this is about? If so, the OP doesn't have a leg to stand on. I could see his point if it was a special item to commemorate an event like Fanfest (Quafe shirt or Quafe Iteron), a free bonus item for buying more plex hardly constitutes anything special. Once again, if you have ever examined the wordings and the marketing gimmick that CCP used to advertise this deal where the ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt was issued, a person of mediocre intellect could've assumed that when reading the terms including "one-time offer," "special edition," "one-time only," one could have surely assumed that this was indeed, literally, a one-tine opportunity to acquire this highly collectible shirts. You are absolutely true that the shirt did not cost $260, but CCP surely used a "tie-in contract" to incentivize folks with additional disposable income, to dish out cash for PLEXs, by offering this purported unique items. You claim that "I got 13 X PLEXs so I should not whine about it" That's not entirely true. Because of CCP's deceptive and ambiguous marketing scheme, many of us were compelled to purchase 13 X PLEXS with the expectation that CCP will hold these wordings including "one-time offer" true for the Shirt. You say we did not incur any costs because we got our PLEXs. There are costs to every transactions and we have incurred more costs than the price of PLEXs themselves. The postponement of purchase for other goods is one. The possibility of having to invest the $260 for additional interest rate is another. There was absolutely no reason for me to purchase 13 X PLEXs all at once, but I did so, because of the compelling and deceptive marketing tactic used my CCP. What I am asking here, is a simple Dev response that pretty much provides explanation for their odd, cryptic, and deceptive marketing practices. As mentioned by hundreds of commentators, I understand that I got "****** in every conceivable holes" by CCP. CCP should provide us with clear message so that this kind of bullshit doesn't happen again... well unless this has been CCP's intention from the beginning. We are proud to introduce a new line of our famous Macanudo cigar, the Portifino line. We are pleased to make a one time only offer of a box of 25 Macanudo Portifino cigars (value $90.00) for only $79.95 all month long. Additionally we are going to include one of our Special Edition Colibri cigar lighters emblazoned with the Macanudo logo with purchase. 6 months later... We are proud to introduce a new line of our famous Macanudo cigar, the Petite line. We are pleased to make a one time only offer of a box of 25 Macanudo Petite cigars (value $75.00) for only $59.95 all month long. Additionally we are going to include one of our Special Edition Colibri cigar lighters emblazoned with the Macanudo logo with purchase. 1 year later... Due to demand we are pleased to annouce that our Special Edition Colibri cigar lighter emblazoned with the Macanudo logo will now be available for purchase at your local tobacco shop for $14.95. None of this is unfactual advertising, and is legitimately done every day in just about every industry you can name. Any claims made that they should not be allowed to include their Special Edition lighter (that they often use to sweeten introductory offers) in more than one advertising campaign, or eventually for seperate sale, would be laughed at. The lighter isn't the "one time offer", it is the sale price on that particular item along with their branded lighter being thrown in addtionally that is the "one time offer". They could easily run that same offer with as many different lines of their cigars as they like, or on the same line but with a different item (say a branded cigar cutter) thrown in instead. By the same token, they can sell as many of their Special Edition lighters as they wish. The fact that they have a unique color or logo on them is what makes them a Special Edition, not a limit on how many are going to be made or sold via various methods. This is exactly the same type of offer that was made that included the shirts in question. At some point you have to take responsibility as a consumer to actually read what an offer is saying before you accept it.
It is pleasing to know that you also enjoy fine cigars. I suggest that you try Romeo Y Julieta from Habana.
You provide an interesting analogy, but once again, just because many companies practice such marketing scheme, doesn't make it necessary for all of us to assume that CCP would possibly do the same as well. Once again, a logical person with mediocre intelligence would assume and take the following words literally, when a reputable company says the offer is a "one-time-offer." As I've mentioned before, I've been in the business of collecting rare oddities and unique items in EVE Online for the past several years and despite several short-fallings, CCP has maintained a good job keeping unique and rare collectible that were associated with "one-time offer" truly unique. It has been only recently (2011 Fall) that CCP deviated from the previous marketing practices, and hence, our zeal to express our anger and demand for clear answers.
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:14:00 -
[33] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:You claim that "I got 13 X PLEXs so I should not whine about it" That's not entirely true. No, it's in fact entirely true. You got exactly what you paid for, and you got a freebie thrown in just for fun. You are now crying that what you got for free is available to others as a much higher price than you paid for it. Quote:Because of CCP's deceptive and ambiguous marketing scheme, many of us were compelled to purchase 13 X PLEXS with the expectation that CCP will hold these wordings including "one-time offer" true for the Shirt. There was nothing deceptive or ambiguous about it: the offer was a one-time deal GÇö you have not been able to buy 13 PLEX and get that shirt for free ever since. The availability of the shirt through other means does not retroactively change the nature of that offer or make the wording false. For that to happen, they'd have to reintroduce the exact same offer (13 PLEX + the same shirt) again. GǪand even then, you'd still be complaining about how other people have to pay more for something you got for nothing. Quote:just because many companies practice such marketing scheme, doesn't make it necessary for all of us to assume that CCP would possibly do the same as well. UhmGǪ yes it pretty much does. CCP uses the same freebie-with-purchase scheme as everyone else. Assuming that it will work like every other freebie-with-purchase scheme seems rather natural, so the normal assumption would be that they would do it the same way.
Not everyone. Take a look at Blizzard. They are another reputable publisher of best-selling games, commanding crowds many folds over the current subscribers of EVE Online. When Blizzard says "one-time-deal" for an ingame item, they mean it. It has been true since the Collector's Edition of WoW to ALL THE SUBSEQUENT IN-GAME ITEMS issued afterwards, for the past 7-8 years or so. I assumed CCP was of similar reputable company that keeps its words.
You can keep playing "word games" here, but I am only going to admit the following: my mistake was to believe that CCP's marketing practices hold integrity, as much as Blizzards do. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:17:00 -
[34] - Quote
Bill Loney wrote:Newz Bie wrote:$200 for a virtual item.
People actually bought that stuff?
ROFL.
WoW, just WoW, people who clearly have too much RL money deserve to have it taken from them. It's like stupidity tax. +1 CCP. This 
Do you really think I am crying over because I lost $200? I would've acted similarly if it was just $2.00. I am not complaining because of the excessive price associated with this issue. I am complaining because CCP unfairly punishes those who take additional risk and those who take "leap of faith." |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:22:00 -
[35] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Bill Loney wrote:Newz Bie wrote:$200 for a virtual item.
People actually bought that stuff?
ROFL.
WoW, just WoW, people who clearly have too much RL money deserve to have it taken from them. It's like stupidity tax. +1 CCP. This  Do you really think I am crying over because I lost $200? I would've acted similarly if it was just $2.00. I am not complaining because of the excessive price associated with this issue. I am complaining because CCP unfairly punishes those who take additional risk and those who take "leap of faith." were you one of those who bought the iPhone in 2007 for $600 only to see it go down to $400 two weeks later
No. I used company phone then. Once again, what you describe there, has no relation to my issue. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:25:00 -
[36] - Quote
Norrin Ellis wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:
Do you really think I am crying over because I lost $200? I would've acted similarly if it was just $2.00. I am not complaining because of the excessive price associated with this issue. I am complaining because CCP unfairly punishes those who take additional risk and those who take "leap of faith."
Risk? What RISK did you take? You paid for 13 PLEX and got 13 PLEX. You also got an additional item FOR FREE. You are crying because CCP didn't protect the exclusivity of your FREE ITEM in perpetuity, so that you could later milk some sap for a few billion ISK profit. Boo-farking-hoo to you. Stop being a baby. You lost NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING.
Crying? Really? Do you not know anything about basic economics and finance? And you are here, lecturing me about how I assumed no risk? Seriously? I am not even going to bother lecturing you about "risk" because talking to a community college graduate is a waste of my time and waste of your time as well. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:31:00 -
[37] - Quote
Dheeradj Esil wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Alaura Aquila wrote:Dheeradj Esil wrote:So.... OP bought 13 PLEX, and got a free shirt with it..... Now the shirt is released to the general public, and he complains that he didn't cash it in earlier?
Brb, buying the shirt from some leftover AUR from the EVE Is Real shizzle! Is that what this is about? If so, the OP doesn't have a leg to stand on. I could see his point if it was a special item to commemorate an event like Fanfest (Quafe shirt or Quafe Iteron), a free bonus item for buying more plex hardly constitutes anything special. Once again, if you have ever examined the wordings and the marketing gimmick that CCP used to advertise this deal where the ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt was issued, a person of mediocre intellect could've assumed that when reading the terms including "one-time offer," "special edition," "one-time only," one could have surely assumed that this was indeed, literally, a one-tine opportunity to acquire this highly collectible shirts. You are absolutely true that the shirt did not cost $260, but CCP surely used a "tie-in contract" to incentivize folks with additional disposable income, to dish out cash for PLEXs, by offering this purported unique items. You claim that "I got 13 X PLEXs so I should not whine about it" That's not entirely true. Because of CCP's deceptive and ambiguous marketing scheme, many of us were compelled to purchase 13 X PLEXS with the expectation that CCP will hold these wordings including "one-time offer" true for the Shirt. You say we did not incur any costs because we got our PLEXs. There are costs to every transactions and we have incurred more costs than the price of PLEXs themselves. The postponement of purchase for other goods is one. The possibility of having to invest the $260 for additional interest rate is another. There was absolutely no reason for me to purchase 13 X PLEXs all at once, but I did so, because of the compelling and deceptive marketing tactic used my CCP. What I am asking here, is a simple Dev response that pretty much provides explanation for their odd, cryptic, and deceptive marketing practices. As mentioned by hundreds of commentators, I understand that I got "****** in every conceivable holes" by CCP. CCP should provide us with clear message so that this kind of bullshit doesn't happen again... well unless this has been CCP's intention from the beginning. Nothing cryptic about it, Limited OFFER, not limited ITEM
I hate bringing up another company for a comparison, but I have to resort to this. When a reputable game publisher says "one-time-offer," you take that literally as a "one-time-offer." As mentioned above, Blizzards has been in the business of issuing unique/rare collectibles as well and when they say "one-time-offer," they mean what they say. It has been true ever since the release of the Collector's Edition and has been true for dozens of subsequent in-game items in the course of 7-8 year history of WoW.
You didn't have to hear me moan and whine only if CCP was crystal clear about its marketing promotion. All i am asking is a Dev, giving me/us a clear answer regarding this issue. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:33:00 -
[38] - Quote
Riedle wrote:OP underlined and bolded some stuff. must be important
Extremely important. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:39:00 -
[39] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:What boggles the mind is why you'd even bother to begin with, when you knew someone would sell it on the market and you could just buy it for ISK anyway.
It's your own fault for reading into advertising what wasn't there. Not even implied. Stop crying.
I made an assumption that others didn't have as much disposable income. How is it my own fault "for reading into advertising what wasn't there" when the advertisement clearly stated that it was a "one-time-offer?" I admit that my mistake was... I took CCP's marketing practice too literally.
I am just asking for CCP's response so this kind of situation does not occur for anyone else in the future. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:40:00 -
[40] - Quote
Dheeradj Esil wrote:The only reason that Warcraft and Starcraft got successfull was because they got 2 great base games to built upon.
(Warhammer and Warhammer 40k for those wondering....)
I am talking about Blizzards' marketing practices. Not about its reason for success. Just comparing one reputable company to another and trust me, prior to this incident, I held CCP more venerated than any other gaming companies out there. Now, I am just annoyed. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:41:00 -
[41] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:Haha, CCP not only stole your money, but also trolled you something rotten!
I hope this serves as a lesson for the future.
I know. =/ |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:48:00 -
[42] - Quote
Katja Faith wrote:I see your first mistake there.
Not everyone was against NEX Store. I had nothing against NEX Store until several of the items that I've purchased for hundreds of millions in ISK, were being sold for $0.50 cents upon the recent patch on NEX.
Lowing the supply of rare ores and increasing its price by 20%-30% is one thing, but artificially implementing a change that deprives hundreds of investors by negative 10,000% return, is far from being "just."
Once again, Dev response to this would be much appreciated. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:53:00 -
[43] - Quote
Bill Loney wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:you got $60 off on a 13 PLEX deal and you're whining about a shirt
laffo This puts it into perspective and makes it even funnier.
Once again, if you have ever examined the wordings and the marketing gimmick that CCP used to advertise this deal where the ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt was issued, a person of mediocre intellect could've assumed that when reading the terms including "one-time offer," "special edition," "one-time only," one could have surely assumed that this was indeed, literally, a one-tine opportunity to acquire this highly collectible shirts. You are absolutely true that the shirt did not cost $260, but CCP surely used a "tie-in contract" to incentivize folks with additional disposable income, to dish out cash for PLEXs, by offering this purported unique items.
You claim that "I got 13 X PLEXs so I should not whine about it" That's not entirely true. Because of CCP's deceptive and ambiguous marketing scheme, many of us were compelled to purchase 13 X PLEXS with the expectation that CCP will hold these wordings including "one-time offer" true for the Shirt. You say we did not incur any costs because we got our PLEXs. There are costs to every transactions and we have incurred more costs than the price of PLEXs themselves. The postponement of purchase for other goods is one. The possibility of having to invest the $260 for additional interest rate is another. There was absolutely no reason for me to purchase 13 X PLEXs all at once, but I did so, because of the compelling and deceptive marketing tactic used my CCP.
What I am asking here, is a simple Dev response that pretty much provides explanation for their odd, cryptic, and deceptive marketing practices.
As mentioned by hundreds of commentators, I understand that I got "****** in every conceivable holes" by CCP.
CCP should provide us with clear message so that this kind of bullshit doesn't happen again... well unless this has been CCP's intention from the beginning. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:54:00 -
[44] - Quote
Ariel Marquette wrote:The devs are too busy laughing at this complaint to type anything coherent.
Yea I know. The sad reality (for me at least) is that what you say is probably true. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:56:00 -
[45] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: Lowing the supply of rare ores and increasing its price by 20%-30% is one thing, but artificially implementing a change that deprives hundreds of investors by negative 10,000% return, is far from being "just."
Once again, Dev response to this would be much appreciated.
you got owned son because you are a goddamned idiot unfortunately, the devs probably aren't supposed to be explicit about that
But you gotta admit, my idiocy is nothing compared to the level of idiocy exhibited by the Great Mittani, your Dear Leader. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:03:00 -
[46] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:But you gotta admit, my idiocy is nothing compared to the level of idiocy exhibited by the Great Mittani, your Dear Leader. you gotta admit, The Mittani has made some pretty decent financial decisions compared to you considering that he's, well, set for life at 30
Except you forgot to take into account about my actual real-life financials. This is a pointless exercise. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:04:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: I had nothing against NEX Store until several of the items that I've purchased for hundreds of millions in ISK, were being sold for $0.50 cents upon the recent patch on NEX.
So as long as it was profitable to you, everything was fine? And once that changed it was suddenly not ok? Also, the limited offer referred to the cheap PLEX and not the shirt (which you got for free) which is why people here do not understand your complaint. Now, if the offer had said that you would be getting a one off shirt that was only ever going to be available by taking advantage of that particular promotion, then you would have cause for complaint. As it stands your arguments and complaints are invalid.
Once again, if you have ever examined the wordings and the marketing gimmick that CCP used to advertise this deal where the ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt was issued, a person of mediocre intellect could've assumed that when reading the terms including "one-time offer," "special edition," "one-time only," one could have surely assumed that this was indeed, literally, a one-tine opportunity to acquire this highly collectible shirts. You are absolutely true that the shirt did not cost $260, but CCP surely used a "tie-in contract" to incentivize folks with additional disposable income, to dish out cash for PLEXs, by offering this purported unique items.
You claim that "I got 13 X PLEXs so I should not whine about it" That's not entirely true. Because of CCP's deceptive and ambiguous marketing scheme, many of us were compelled to purchase 13 X PLEXS with the expectation that CCP will hold these wordings including "one-time offer" true for the Shirt. You say we did not incur any costs because we got our PLEXs. There are costs to every transactions and we have incurred more costs than the price of PLEXs themselves. The postponement of purchase for other goods is one. The possibility of having to invest the $260 for additional interest rate is another. There was absolutely no reason for me to purchase 13 X PLEXs all at once, but I did so, because of the compelling and deceptive marketing tactic used my CCP.
What I am asking here, is a simple Dev response that pretty much provides explanation for their odd, cryptic, and deceptive marketing practices.
As mentioned by hundreds of commentators, I understand that I got "****** in every conceivable holes" by CCP.
CCP should provide us with clear message so that this kind of bullshit doesn't happen again... well unless this has been CCP's intention from the beginning. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:08:00 -
[48] - Quote
Ariel Marquette wrote:How many times are you going to repeat the same bogus argument? Everyone here has examined the details of the offer, and you're the only one who seems to have gotten it all wrong.
Not really because the mail I just got back from one of the CCP Devs said he is "aware of the issue." |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:10:00 -
[49] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: But you gotta admit, my idiocy is nothing compared to the level of idiocy exhibited by the Great Mittani, your Dear Leader.
no dear leader never spent $300 just to acquire virtual pants i will take drunkenly making a fool of yourself over spending $300 on virtual pants any day of the week
I spent $260 to get a damn virtual shirt. I don't see anything wrong with that. I am spending what I earned. Some spend it on hookers and enjoy a colorful concoction of STDs and Herpies. I spend it on nerdy items. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:12:00 -
[50] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: I had nothing against NEX Store until several of the items that I've purchased for hundreds of millions in ISK, were being sold for $0.50 cents upon the recent patch on NEX.
So as long as it was profitable to you, everything was fine? And once that changed it was suddenly not ok? Also, the limited offer referred to the cheap PLEX and not the shirt (which you got for free) which is why people here do not understand your complaint. Now, if the offer had said that you would be getting a one off shirt that was only ever going to be available by taking advantage of that particular promotion, then you would have cause for complaint. As it stands your arguments and complaints are invalid. Once again, if you have ever examined the wordings and the marketing gimmick that CCP used to advertise this deal where the ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt was issued, a person of mediocre intellect could've assumed that when reading the terms including "one-time offer," "special edition," "one-time only," one could have surely assumed that this was indeed, literally, a one-tine opportunity to acquire this highly collectible shirts. You are absolutely true that the shirt did not cost $260, but CCP surely used a "tie-in contract" to incentivize folks with additional disposable income, to dish out cash for PLEXs, by offering this purported unique items. You claim that "I got 13 X PLEXs so I should not whine about it" That's not entirely true. Because of CCP's deceptive and ambiguous marketing scheme, many of us were compelled to purchase 13 X PLEXS with the expectation that CCP will hold these wordings including "one-time offer" true for the Shirt. You say we did not incur any costs because we got our PLEXs. There are costs to every transactions and we have incurred more costs than the price of PLEXs themselves. The postponement of purchase for other goods is one. The possibility of having to invest the $260 for additional interest rate is another. There was absolutely no reason for me to purchase 13 X PLEXs all at once, but I did so, because of the compelling and deceptive marketing tactic used my CCP. What I am asking here, is a simple Dev response that pretty much provides explanation for their odd, cryptic, and deceptive marketing practices. As mentioned by hundreds of commentators, I understand that I got "****** in every conceivable holes" by CCP. CCP should provide us with clear message so that this kind of bullshit doesn't happen again... well unless this has been CCP's intention from the beginning. Why are you copy pasting a reply to a previous poster instead of reading what I wrote and responding accordingly? The error was yours, not CCP's. No-one has deprived you, deceived you or falsely advertised anything. The advert was quite clear, the shirt was a freebie and the offer was for the reduced price on the PLEX. Also, please respond to the section of your post that I quoted and made a statement about. Thank you.
I do this because my previous answer covers it. I do this because what you asked, was asked by dozen others.
|
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:13:00 -
[51] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: I spent $260 to get a damn virtual shirt. I don't see anything wrong with that. I am spending what I earned. Some spend it on hookers and enjoy a colorful concoction of STDs and Herpies. I spend it on nerdy items.
just because you don't understand why this is shameful doesn't mean the rest of us don't
Then you have no understanding of basic economics. I pity you and your community college education. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:18:00 -
[52] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Ariel Marquette wrote:How many times are you going to repeat the same bogus argument? Everyone here has examined the details of the offer, and you're the only one who seems to have gotten it all wrong. Not really because the mail I just got back from one of the CCP Devs said he is "aware of the issue." Which simply means he has read either this or the feed back thread. I suppose they could refund the 500 AUR price to you as a gesture of good will. Again, a one time offer to get a special price on PLEX and an additional Special Edition shirt with purchase is one thing. A one time offer to aquire a Special Edition shirt is quite another.
I know my situation is funny to you guys, but there are dozens of other players who were adversely affected by recent CCP's decision to introduce these items via NEX for $0.50. There are dozens of other players who invested approximately 1.1B-1.2B to purchase the shirts. There are also dozens more, who spent several hundred million ISKs to purchase the outfits offered via the Russian Boxed Edition. CCP pretty much deprived much of the investments made by those unfortunate individuals.
If CCP is to offer reparation as a "gesture of good will," it needs to offer the going market-rate prior to the recent patch. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:22:00 -
[53] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:I know my situation is funny to you guys, but there are dozens of other players who were adversely affected by recent CCP's decision to introduce these items via NEX for $0.50. There are dozens of other players who invested approximately 1.1B-1.2B to purchase the shirts. There are also dozens more, who spent several hundred million ISKs to purchase the outfits offered via the Russian Boxed Edition. CCP pretty much deprived much of the investments made by those unfortunate individuals.
If CCP is to offer reparation as a "gesture of good will," it needs to offer the going market-rate prior to the recent patch. where's the chorus of affected players, then
Here is a small sample of the chorus from the affected players. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:28:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Ariel Marquette wrote:How many times are you going to repeat the same bogus argument? Everyone here has examined the details of the offer, and you're the only one who seems to have gotten it all wrong. Not really because the mail I just got back from one of the CCP Devs said he is "aware of the issue." Which simply means he has read either this or the feed back thread. I suppose they could refund the 500 AUR price to you as a gesture of good will. Again, a one time offer to get a special price on PLEX and an additional Special Edition shirt with purchase is one thing. A one time offer to aquire a Special Edition shirt is quite another. I know my situation is funny to you guys, but there are dozens of other players who were adversely affected by recent CCP's decision to introduce these items via NEX for $0.50. There are dozens of other players who invested approximately 1.1B-1.2B to purchase the shirts. There are also dozens more, who spent several hundred million ISKs to purchase the outfits offered via the Russian Boxed Edition. CCP pretty much deprived much of the investments made by those unfortunate individuals. If CCP is to offer reparation as a "gesture of good will," it needs to offer the going market-rate prior to the recent patch. The only value CCP has ever assigned those items is 500 AUR (or is it lower, I forget). The price other players put on those items is not something CCP controls nor should be held accountable for. If they had specifically stated the item would never be offered again, I would most certainly be on your side in this. But they did not.
I don't really mine or have a complete understanding of the loot rate, but when CCP decided to cut off the ore supplies from the Drone Region and when the price of the affected ores spiked by as much as 20-30% initially, there were furious players asking for changes.
Those who were affected by the recent Nex Store move, were adversely affected by more than hundreds of % in negative return, upon the initial investment (those who purchased the shirts with ISK). Are you really telling us that CCP is not accountable for depriving their initial capital by several folds? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:32:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:I know my situation is funny to you guys, but there are dozens of other players who were adversely affected by recent CCP's decision to introduce these items via NEX for $0.50. There are dozens of other players who invested approximately 1.1B-1.2B to purchase the shirts. There are also dozens more, who spent several hundred million ISKs to purchase the outfits offered via the Russian Boxed Edition. CCP pretty much deprived much of the investments made by those unfortunate individuals.
If CCP is to offer reparation as a "gesture of good will," it needs to offer the going market-rate prior to the recent patch. where's the chorus of affected players, then Here is a small sample of the chorus from the affected players. You realize that there are only 2 or 3 people in that entire thread complaining right?
Then can we safely assume that based on the number of active forum-goers, we can extrapolate and apply that percentage to that number you've specified? Just because only 2 or 3 people are complaining doesn't necessarily mean that those were the only adversely affected party amongst 350,000 subscribers. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 04:37:00 -
[56] - Quote
Judging by the CCPGÇÖs recent action to remove the two highly controversial items from NEX Store, it shows CCPGÇÖs admittance on their mistake to release those two items on the NEX Store in the first place.
Removing those two items is an appropriate first step, but that does not provide any reparation for those who were adversely affected by CCPGÇÖs marketing failure. Those who took the GÇ£leap of faithGÇ¥ in CCPGÇÖs are still disenfranchised by seeing billions of their initial investments on these unique shirts turned to GÇ£dustGÇ¥ due to the untold number of those shirts being circulated out into the market, thanks to CCPGÇÖs mistake of releasing those items for $0.50 on NEX Store.
Obviously CCP can not take away hundreds of ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION SHIRT and WOMENGÇÖS EXECUTOR COAT (RED/GOLD) that were purchased for $0.50 post the recent patch.
CCP needs to make appropriate reparations in forms of another completely unique items to the previous owners of those rare apparels. Those are the only GÇ£justGÇ¥ and GÇ£equitableGÇ¥ action. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 04:48:00 -
[57] - Quote
It is imperative that CCP Devs need to clarify this issue, not merely by simply taking out the two highly controversial items from NEX Store, but a verbal admittance of their screw-up and their assurance that those who took the "leap of faith" are not in the constant fear of having their investments being devalued to "dust" due to CCP's carelessness.
It is imperative because the success of CCP's future marketing promotions depends on accountability and clarity. Once again, no players should be afraid of partaking in CCP's future marketing promotions or NEX Store because of the constant fear of having their investments devalued next to nothing. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 04:56:00 -
[58] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:It is imperative that CCP Devs need to clarify this issue, not merely by simply taking out the two highly controversial items from NEX Store, but a verbal admittance of their screw-up and their assurance that those who took the "leap of faith" are not in the constant fear of having their investments being devalued to "dust" due to CCP's carelessness.
It is imperative because the success of CCP's future marketing promotions depends on accountability and clarity. Once again, no players should be afraid of partaking in CCP's future marketing promotions or NEX Store because of the constant fear of having their investments devalued next to nothing. It was pretty crystal clear from the get-go: you got a free shirt. If you overvalued your free shirt, then that's your problem, not CCP's.
Playing wording games and adhering to your suggestions will only ruin the prospect of CCP's future marketing promotions and NEX Store from being successful.
350,000 active players make up the EVE Online. It is vital that there is a healthy stream of those who purchase PLEX for cash / delve in marketing promotions for the long-term success of this beautiful game. At the end of the day, cash inflow is the biggest determinant of the longevity of any profit-seeking entity. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 05:31:00 -
[59] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Maybe you're not seeing them because all the people like me, instead of watching the forums, were watching the actual game. GǪwhere they weren't listed in either the NeX or the market over here. Now, I'll grant you that, considering what a piece of useless tat the NeX is (and considering that it has done this on multiple occasions before), it simply didn't show up unless you did the correct rubber-chicken-wave dance, but there's a reason why I asked what the item was actually called a dozen pages back: because I wasn't seeing it. Not as in "no items available" GÇö I mean as in "not listed in the clothing section". If there has been a new patch since yesterday, I suppose I could update and see if anything has changed (not that it really matters as far as the OP's core complaint goes). The Antiquarian wrote:Playing wording games and adhering to your suggestions will only ruin the prospect of CCP's future marketing promotions and NEX Store from being successful. So waitGǪ is that an argument for or against this kind of promotion? Anyway, the good news is that they weren't playing any word games to begin with. They were making a standard one-time special offer: 13 PLEX + shirt, and you got exactly that. You just got suckered in the same way people get suckered by those GÇ£free with purchaseGÇ¥ offers you see everywhere in modern society. The effect it has on future promotions is nil (unless, at some point, they offer a genuine GÇ£limited editionGÇ¥ and make it unlimited, but that's not what we're talking about here).
You and your wording games again. For a game that is deemed old and perceived to be suitable only for niche crowds, effective marketing promotions become even more crucial to incentivize prospective players from joining EVE Online. That includes transparant marketing practices with assurance that when CCP claims that a deal is "special," it is indeed a special deal. That includes wordings like "one-time offer" which should translate to "one-time offer" of definite nature, not being available in the future periods.
If CCP continues to say "one-time" here and "limited-time" there, while having those goodies available for prices of *****, then the power of marketing diminishes and no one will eventually take CCP's marketing promotions seriously. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
389
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 06:16:00 -
[60] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:Tippia wrote:so I still kind of wonder exactly what shirt the OP is talking about Wow.
Wow I didn't see that. So that pretty much validates that Tippia is here only to spite others and play his "wording games." Despite Tippia's persistant rambling about him being fully aware of the PLEX Purchase & Ishukone Shirt/Collector's Edition & Women's Executor Shirt (Red/Gold) marketing promotions, he actually hasn't even seen the promotions, or let alone, knows which items we are talking about!
What is the point of taking your points seriously when you derive your arguments based on base-less rumors by others? |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
390
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 06:44:00 -
[61] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:It's funny that you think it invalidates the argument.
Well, at least CCP agreed half of the points addressed by us and subsequently removed the items in questions, out of NEX Store.
Still one issue remains: reparation & returning the disenfranchised owners to the previous financial conditions.
Oh an most importantly, CCP's assurance that such mishap won't ever happen. Or at least, CCP's promise for a more transparant marketing practices/messages. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
390
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 06:49:00 -
[62] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:KrakizBad wrote:It's funny that you think it invalidates the argument. Well, at least CCP agreed half of the points addressed by us and subsequently removed the items in questions, out of NEX Store. Still one issue remains: reparation & returning the disenfranchised owners to the previous financial conditions. Let's count all the times CCP has done that after altering something that an investor lost money on, shall we?
Recent returns with the rare collectibles including Python, Asp, Anaconda, unique ores, Hellhound and rare Mining - Elite/UNUSED drones, and countless number of mine BPCs after their initial screw-up.
And this is crucial to strengthen the "invested people's" confidence in the CCP's corporate governance and marketing practices.
If CCP wants an effective marketing promotions, they need to resolve these issues first. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
390
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 07:11:00 -
[63] - Quote
Katie Frost wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: If CCP continues to say "one-time" here and "limited-time" there, while having those goodies available for prices of *****, then the power of marketing diminishes and no one will eventually take CCP's marketing promotions seriously.
If you bought 13 PLEX just to obtain a shirt... then you sir, are an absolute moron. I am hoping that you bought the 13 PLEX for the 13 PLEX and the shirt was just a bonus. Looking at your whinging for the past 18 pages though, I am now quite certain you were after the interweb shirt  . It's like every other marketing strategy out there: buy one, get one free; for a limited time only you also get this; call within the next 30 minutes and we'll throw in this piece of junk for free. It's called MARKETING and one thing CCP can always bank on is stupidity of people, no matter what the market share is. So, why should CCP not take advantage of peoples stupidity and capitalise on it? People do it all the time, everywhere, in every way. The funny thing is though, that you didn't even get ripped off. You just imagined that this was a special, one-time item. In fact, it was a one-time offer GÇô [b]referring to the 13 PLEX + shirt[b]. The "one-time" or "limited" had no relevance to the future availability of either PLEX or the shirt itself. You just imagined that part and are now calling it "word play" because your realised your stupidity in believing that this was a limited edition item, when it was never advertised as such. If anything CCP should continue marketing in such a way because I am positive that there will always be lowest denominators in society that will do exactly what you have done and CCP will, and rightfully should, profit from it. Others will purchase the same shirt and sell it after a week to get even more profit out of it, because they were smart enough to realise that with ongoing upgrades and developments of the NEX store, any vanity item will become available and their value will drop. I truly hope you donGÇÖt handle your own finances.
Here you are preaching me about finance, when you don't even understand the basic concept of "risk." There are indirect costs associated with purchasing needless 39 x PLEXs all at once, after having been incentivized by CCP to do so with unclear marketing promotions. Far more costs than merely the specified costs.
Before you start preaching me about finance, I suggest that you beef up on your understanding of finance and economics first. My finance is very sound, both here in EVE Online and outside the game, in RL situation. My only mistake was the assumption that I set when purchasing those PLEXs. I held CCP as a refutable company that does not resort to the marketing practices commonly utilized by cash-desperate - deceptive companies including Cryptics, Mythics, and Perfect Entertainment. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
390
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 08:56:00 -
[64] - Quote
Dheeradj Esil wrote:Well, seeing as the shirt in question is removed from the NeX Store, CCP still bends backwards for whiny bitches like OP....
Whiny ***** with a valid reasoning, my community college friend. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
391
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 09:39:00 -
[65] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:If I were you OP (thank goodness I'm not!), I'd go back and read through a few of your last posts, checking grammar and word choice, before bringing out the old 'community college' burn on others.
I highly recommend you to try this amazing exercise of having to read hundreds of posts filled with a copious amount of insults and slurs aimed at you. Once you are done doing that little exercise, try writing hundreds of responses and at the same time, try your best to remain civil and composed. I guarantee you that by the time you reach your 100th post, grammar and usage of words will be the least of your concerns. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
391
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 09:47:00 -
[66] - Quote
Freezehunter wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Bumblefck wrote:If I were you OP (thank goodness I'm not!), I'd go back and read through a few of your last posts, checking grammar and word choice, before bringing out the old 'community college' burn on others. I highly recommend you to try this amazing exercise of having to read hundreds of posts filled with a copious amount of insults and slurs aimed at you. Once you are done doing that little exercise, try writing hundreds of responses and at the same time, try your best to remain civil and composed. I guarantee you that by the time you reach your 100th post, grammar and usage of words will be the least of your concerns. I hate you for being a rich spoiled brat idiot that went to a college paid for by daddy, The Antiquarian, but I have to agree with that last one you said. CURSE ME AND MY NEUTRALITY. I should be a judge. >.>
I think I liked the post you wrote before the "edit" more. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
393
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 15:28:00 -
[67] - Quote
CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Alaura Aquila wrote: Will the shirts we bought for 500 Aur be deleted after the "fix"?
Nope!
Thank you for providing us with prompt responses. In that case, could you kindly let us know what is being planned to provide a fair and appropriate compensation for the investors who were disenfranchised by the devaluation of their investments on Ishukone Special Edition & Women's Executor (Red/Gold)?
Wouldn't it be only fair that we are compensated for another set of unique items currently non-existant in the market as part of returning our financials to the previous status while simultaneously providing us with the reparation for all the inconvenience this issue has caused? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
393
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 16:27:00 -
[68] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: In that case, could you kindly let us know what is being planned to provide a fair and appropriate compensation for the investors who were disenfranchised by the devaluation of their investments on Ishukone Special Edition & Women's Executor (Red/Gold)?
I don't think you fully understand what 'disenfranchised' means. I think you may have to return to this hallowed community college of yours. As a side note, I think that it's rather laughable you got upset through the re-organisation of this fairyland item. I additionally think it's amusing that you're asking for a replacement rare item to 'compensate'. The bottom line is that you bought this t-shirt and it was delivered as stated by CCP. Did you ever say 'It's too tight', or 'It doesn't match with my second-rate Star Trek wizard cloak'? No? Fit for purpose then.
Ummm... no. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
393
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 16:30:00 -
[69] - Quote
In response to the Dev's comment, more diversity in cosmetic items in NeX Store = win-win situation for everyone. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
393
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 16:44:00 -
[70] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Alaura Aquila wrote: Will the shirts we bought for 500 Aur be deleted after the "fix"?
Nope! Thank you for providing us with prompt responses. In that case, could you kindly let us know what is being planned to provide a fair and appropriate compensation for the investors who were disenfranchised by the devaluation of their investments on Ishukone Special Edition & Women's Executor (Red/Gold)? Wouldn't it be only fair that we are compensated for another set of unique items currently non-existant in the market as part of returning our financials to the previous status while simultaneously providing us with the reparation for all the inconvenience this issue has caused? I am working with Torfi to resolve this situation for everyone as quickly as possible. As this affects several hundred pilots we want to make sure that we are doing it right and as fairly to everyone as possible. There are two different scenarios here and the issue of the Ishukone shirt and Executor coat are different. I will explain why: Ishukone Sterling Shirt - Issued over a very specific time frame. This item should only be valid for pilots who participated in the PLEX offer which happened in October 2011. Women's Executor Coat -Part of the Russian Collectors edition which is still in circulation. While still a rare item, there will be more added to the game naturally as more people pick up a copy of the Russian box. I will aim to provide an update tomorrow on exactly what we plan to do. That plan is almost final, however, I do not want to state something which may change in the next 24 hours.
Thank you very much, CCP Spitfire, CCP Navigator, and CCP t0rfifrans. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
393
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 17:23:00 -
[71] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Nice to see a resolution to this in the works. But let's face it. It was a massive screw up and needs to be prevented in the future. The fix is as simple as putting a flag on unique items so that when things are shunted from one department to another there will not be any accidental additions to the NeX store. If this had been done, Torfi would have seen it and known not to add these items to the Exchange. Mr Epeen 
That is absolutely true. Could you provide us with some kind of assurance that these unique/rare items associated with certain events/promotions/history will not be susceptible to this kind of devaluation via unintentional introduction into NeX Store or other future marketing promotions?
Collecting is not the most popular profession, but it is still part of this so-called "sand box" experience. Collectors should not play this game with this constant fear that their investments will be devalued by future marketing promotions. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
500
|
Posted - 2012.07.01 01:51:00 -
[72] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:Any news on this topic?
Any news on this topic? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
502
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 05:53:00 -
[73] - Quote
Are we going to be hearing any response fro CCP soon regarding the matter of reparation? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
502
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 05:58:00 -
[74] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:They were taken off the market, holy crap the whining. Your 'investment' was never guaranteed, enjoy your losses.
Umm no. There are certain individuals with billions of assets tied to those investments. Even if CCP did pull those items back, CCP's previous mistake irreparably damaged the original investment that went in to fund those clothings. Ishukone was selling for 1.1B-1.5B (it went up to approximately 2B during the early stage of marketing), but now, despite the CCP's corrective measure, the price is only merely FRACTION of the original cost prior to the marketing debacle.
I will stop complaining when ALL THE PARTIES that were adversely affected, are justly and equitably compensated. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
502
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 06:02:00 -
[75] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:They were taken off the market, holy crap the whining. Your 'investment' was never guaranteed, enjoy your losses.
And of course we understand that nothing is guaranteed but we can all make logical assumptions based on the past history of CCP's marketing promotions. For one, we assumed that CCP was a reputable company that joins pantheon of other amazing companies that are absolutely serious when they advertise that certain ingames are obtainable via through "one-time-deal" only. Second, we assumed that although nothing is guaranteed, CCP would never take a drastic action that would deprive investors in a brink of seconds for no apparent reasons.
We are asking for compensation for all the BS that we have been enduring for a week or so. We have every right to whine and moan, until an appropriate compensation is made AND with a CLEAR STATEMENT from CCP regarding their future marketing promotions and promises that they won't reintroduce old historical items again. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
502
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 08:33:00 -
[76] - Quote
hedge betts Shiyurida wrote:How is this a threadnought.
It's not that hard to understand,ccp made x amount of t-shirts to go.with the promotion. The promotion number was not reached so ccp had surplus stock left. In oder to get rid of the stock they sell it of at a discount.
There is not a shop in the world that would not and has not done this.
CCP only failing was to not set a proper discount price on the original offer to insure that all promotional items were snapped up.
No. The concept of "surplus / excessive inventory" only applies to physical goods. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
502
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 08:40:00 -
[77] - Quote
Bree Okanata wrote:Marketing Malpractice to me is having the Amarr shirt in the EVE store cheaper than the other race's shirts (Though I get it, it is made by slaves).
Also, I didn't see an Amarr shot glass, whereas Caldari, Gallente and Minmatar have ones. How am I supposed to get a full set? Those Amarrian prudes don't like booze?
Hahahaha
A perfectly valid questions for CCP Devs when they provide answer regarding compensation later today. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
504
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 13:21:00 -
[78] - Quote
We were told that CCP would inform us of its decision regarding compensation for the devaluation of our investments two days ago. Is there a reason to this silence? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
504
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 13:41:00 -
[79] - Quote
Rikula wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:We were told that CCP would inform us of its decision regarding compensation for the devaluation of our investments two days ago. Is there a reason to this silence? Probably the weekend is the reason :)
Yup hehe just trying to entice our CCP to get back to us as soon as possible. I don't want this issue being postponed until the completion of the Alliance Tournament. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
504
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 15:18:00 -
[80] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:CCP Navigator I hope you realize you will make many more customers happy by driving The Antiquarian bonkers than by humoring him.
Much appreciated for the bump. Still waiting for CCP's response. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.03 15:09:00 -
[81] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Khalia Nestune wrote:Rond Dorlezahn wrote:If you bought 13 plex for cash to get a SHIRT, I have no sympathy whatsoever for your plight ^ this At that time it was the only way to get that shirt. I can see a reasonable expectation that it would have remained that way. a reasonable expectation requires a reasonable person a reasonable person does not spend $300 on virtual shirts ergo it is impossible for there to be a reasonable expectation re: a $300 virtual shirt you purchased
Not all reasonable folks think and value alike.
I am spending what I earned. Some spend it on hookers and enjoy a colorful concoction of STDs and Herpies. I spend it on nerdy items. Some people dish out $600 for a seven course meal at the Fat Duck or $1,400 for a fourteen-course meal at El Bulli, while those who spend $8 at Olive Garden might think of those who dine at the Fat Duck or El Bulli as "unreasonable" or "regarded financially."
Just keep your high school logic to yourself. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.03 21:08:00 -
[82] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: Not all reasonable folks think and value alike.
the very point of the definition of a reasonable person is to exclude people who make bad choices sorry, but you make bad choices
You still do not understand the concept of everyone having different values and interests. At this point, I am just going to assume that you are just a poor and miserable person with significantly less disposable income. If not, you would've understood this concept. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.03 21:09:00 -
[83] - Quote
And CCP, is there a reason why you are not letting us know of your decision? You claimed that you will provide us with information on Friday, but it's already Wednesday now. Do you really wish us to continue this senseless "debate" amongst us?
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 08:03:00 -
[84] - Quote
Arcane Sun wrote:Almost a week and still no response, CCP troll is best troll.  Ya know, if they made clothing optional we probably wouldn't even be having this thread. They should just give the original recipients of the shirt a provokingly large belt buckle, some really tight pants or at least a pimp cup to hold all their tears in. After all whats a shirt without the rest of the outfit?
Or a provocatively visible golden crown with aurum tokens embellishing the sides.
Or a big fat hat that says "Fool." Either way, they are unique and I won't have any quarrel with em. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 14:24:00 -
[85] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:They can't even remember to reply to this thread.
What's the chances they're going to remember about a shirt a year later.
You've seen goon personalities in this thread, now imagine one of them pulling the strings.
This must be one of CCP's new tactics. Promising us with dev responses, but greeting us with absolute silence for the next several months, and then silently locking away the thread for "inactivity."
The promised response is 5-6 days overdue..... |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
508
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 20:54:00 -
[86] - Quote
Adalun Dey wrote:Please, keep us updated on CCP's response, OP.
Here is CCP's response for now.
"The Antiquarian wrote: Dear CCP Bayesian, could you politely "poke" our CCP t0rfifrans and kindly have him announce CCP's decision regarding the Ishukone Special Edition shirt & Women Executor (Red/Gold)? He promised that he will provide with the answers on Friday, but it's already been five days now.
CCP Bayesian: I poked him and the answer is that it's still being worked on." |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 03:55:00 -
[87] - Quote
Adalun Dey wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:When you can tell me what a fair compromise is, that's about the same time as you should expect a response about this from CCP. I'm sure any piece of clothing that can't be attained through other channels would be considered fair compromise. Even a simple change in colors would make it unique. Maybe a shirt that says "Oops" would be nice as well. I think the issue is more to get something unique (limited), a collectible so to speak. What exactly matters less. Right?
Agree absolutely |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 16:16:00 -
[88] - Quote
It's been a week already and we haven't received any response.
Are we suppose to spend the weekend again, waiting? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 16:39:00 -
[89] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Take the hint.
At least we are here to receive a promised compensation for CCP's mistake.
But you are here again and again, only to throw in trifle remarks with no value whatsoever. Do you really have nothing else to do? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 17:21:00 -
[90] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:KrakizBad wrote:Take the hint. At least we are here to receive a promised compensation for CCP's mistake. But you are here again and again, only to throw in trifle remarks with no value whatsoever. Do you really have nothing else to do? Making fun of your idiocy is a valuable use of my time.
Hahaha you are funny. You keep claiming that I am an "idiot." I haven't seen your tax returns so I am not sure about your current financial situation, but nevertheless, I am HIGHLY CONFIDENT that my net worth tops yours by many folds, and my financials are far more sound than yours.
If you are willing to provide me with your returns, I am more than willing to provide mine as well. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 18:17:00 -
[91] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:the antiquarian, fresh off another round of humiliating himself, pulls out the "im rich irl so clearly i can't be as dumb as anyone who can read has concluded" card again
like before, it is made out of crayon and has stains from juice spills on it
I am just providing an appropriate response for a fool who keeps insisting that I am an idiot. You and your Goon pals are so funny. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 18:24:00 -
[92] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:I'm afraid that my tax returns requires reading comprehension in excess of that of an advertisement, therefore you would be unable to read or comprehend it, sorry.
As a former accountant at Big Four and currently employed at J.P. Morgan, I can read and audit your pitiful returns and returns from your trailer trash company with ease. You can continue spitting out nonsensical bullshit. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 18:32:00 -
[93] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:i am also ceo of all big four accounting firms and we have all disowned you
Except you dumb Goon can't differentiate between a corporation and LLP. Big Four accounting firms do not have CEOs as heads. You dumb ****. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 18:37:00 -
[94] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:As a former accountant at Big Four and currently employed at J.P. Morgan GǪyou're giving us a much better understanding of why Enron and WoldCom happened.
Oh great. Your "we are 99%" plea won't sway me. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 18:38:00 -
[95] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Weaselior wrote:i am also ceo of all big four accounting firms and we have all disowned you Except you dumb Goon can't differentiate between a corporation and LLP. Big Four accounting firms do not have CEOs as heads. You dumb ****. i have decreed they do, in my latest completely plausible claim
You Goons unanimously keep labeling me as an idiot and trying to dissuade me from asking for any reparation from CCP.
Do not worry. I still have 10,058 Goon tears to fuel me till I get Dev's response regarding appropriate compensations. Pretty handy work, don't you think? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 18:42:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Oh great. Your "we are 99%" plea won't sway me. Yeah, no. I'm just calling you incompetent and clueless about basic economics and finance, what with having worked at an accounting firm and all.
Oh I am clueless about basic economics and finance? Could you kindly tell me from which great educational institution you received your economics and finance training? Could you kindly let me know at which firm you are working for right now? I bought those PLEXs to receive the shirt with valid reasonings and assumptions. You can keep telling me that I am an idiot, but I still get the last laugh while you dine at Country Kitchen Buffet. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 19:10:00 -
[97] - Quote
Adalun Dey wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Oh great. Your "we are 99%" plea won't sway me. I'm a poor chum from the 99% and I still agree that there should be collectibles in Eve. Even if I have none myself whatsoever. All this E-peen sure is bumping this thread, it's also derailing it though.
I wasn't looking for a fight here. I was expressing my humble plea to receive a fair and just compensation for CCP's mistake. All this moaning, whining, derailing threads will cease once we get an appropriate response from CCP Devs. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 19:18:00 -
[98] - Quote
Aryth wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Adalun Dey wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Oh great. Your "we are 99%" plea won't sway me. I'm a poor chum from the 99% and I still agree that there should be collectibles in Eve. Even if I have none myself whatsoever. All this E-peen sure is bumping this thread, it's also derailing it though. I wasn't looking for a fight here. I was expressing my humble plea to receive a fair and just compensation for CCP's mistake. All this moaning, whining, derailing threads will cease once we get an appropriate response from CCP Devs. Been there done that. Lemme spoil the ending for you. You ain't getting anything.
"Update: The ishukone shirt did go out accidentally. Meaning the person picking items for the offers ( me ) wasn't aware of it having been used in a PLEX promotion. Bad bad Torfi. Now that it is out and there is an issue with people that had the shirt prior as a coveted rare collectors item, we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible. Expect an update later today on the issue. It's interesting thought that it became the most popular and traded item of the new clothes we put out in Inferno 1.1.
In other news, do you think we should sell bi-monocles? An item that's essentially two monocles, one for each eye, costing as much as two monocles? I just think there's a tiny portion of players that might find it amusing to wear those. A vulgar display of, something..."
CCP t0rfifrans and CCP Spitfire disagree with your assessment. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 19:36:00 -
[99] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Might be time to click the blue bars, read with comprehension and admit you are either wrong or tell us how you know more than CCP devs about what happened here. How am I wrong? Where do I claim to know more than the CCP devs? The fact remains: he got something for free and he's pissed that others had to pay more for it.
You enjoy repetition right? Here is one for you. Just for you.
"Update: The ishukone shirt did go out accidentally. Meaning the person picking items for the offers ( me ) wasn't aware of it having been used in a PLEX promotion. Bad bad Torfi. Now that it is out and there is an issue with people that had the shirt prior as a coveted rare collectors item, we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible. Expect an update later today on the issue. It's interesting thought that it became the most popular and traded item of the new clothes we put out in Inferno 1.1.
In other news, do you think we should sell bi-monocles? An item that's essentially two monocles, one for each eye, costing as much as two monocles? I just think there's a tiny portion of players that might find it amusing to wear those. A vulgar display of, something..."
CCP t0rfifrans and CCP Spitfire disagree with your assessment. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 19:54:00 -
[100] - Quote
Aryth wrote:
We still don't have anything.
They keep all the ISK at the Evetel California.
I am not too familiar with Goons' affairs. Could you be little more specific? |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 20:30:00 -
[101] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:CCP t0rfifrans and CCP Spitfire disagree with your assessment. Not really, no. They don't even mention anything related to it. The reason I keep repeating myself is because you can't come up with a good answer or argument to the opposite: you got something for free that others had to pay for, and you seem to be upset that your free novelty keychain was available in the stores. Why should you be compensated for them having to pay more than you did? Or, if you like: how am I wrong? Where do I claim to know more than the CCP devs?
Since you love repeating things over and over again, I will do the same for you.
Here's CCP's response.
"Update: The ishukone shirt did go out accidentally. Meaning the person picking items for the offers ( me ) wasn't aware of it having been used in a PLEX promotion. Bad bad Torfi. Now that it is out and there is an issue with people that had the shirt prior as a coveted rare collectors item, we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible. Expect an update later today on the issue. It's interesting thought that it became the most popular and traded item of the new clothes we put out in Inferno 1.1.
In other news, do you think we should sell bi-monocles? An item that's essentially two monocles, one for each eye, costing as much as two monocles? I just think there's a tiny portion of players that might find it amusing to wear those. A vulgar display of, something..." |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
509
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 20:33:00 -
[102] - Quote
Oh and my sincere apologies Tippia. I didn't even read your posting. No worth reading em anymore.
You can expect similar response for all your future postings.
CCP Dev admitted their mistake and they told us that they will provide us with a fair and just way to compensate us. All I am here for, is to wait for their response.
Not here to argue with you anymore, Tippia. You can keep saying blah blah blah.
All I hear from you (and will hear from you) is blah blah blah anyway. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 05:22:00 -
[103] - Quote
Mechael wrote:Fair would be the removal of Aurum from EVE. Just sayin'.
That is a pathetic answer. There is nothing wrong with Aurum system. It provides additional cash inflow for CCP while having absolutely no impact on the pre-existing capusleers' gameplay.
It is a system only for those who are willing to spend their own money purely for cosmetic purpose. Do you think having CCP rely on "almost free-to-play" model by allowing capsuleers to fund their own subscription via ISK, sustainable in the long run?
More cash inflow => Higher valuation of the company => the cost of capital goes down for both, equity and debt => better financing options from willing banks and other investors => more employees, more gameplay, more expansions, more Dust, more WoD, more EVE Online, more compensated CCP employees, more quality contents => Win-Win situation for all the stakeholders.
Don't just think about the short-term. Think about what is best for EVE Online and CCP in the long-run for Christ's sake. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 06:34:00 -
[104] - Quote
Morgorathi wrote:I still find it funny this thread is going. Especially when 'The Antiquarian' isn't even wearing the shirt he has been bitching about for the last 26 pages.
What kind of dumb logic is that? If I am bitching, whining, and moaning about the said item, I need to be wearing em? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 08:17:00 -
[105] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Since you love repeating things over and over again, I will do the same for you. GǪand thus repeat the failure to prove me wrong. The fact remains: you got something for free. You're bitching about how others could pay for it. You are angry that your free novelty key chain was available in the store. Also, the question remains: why should you be compensated for something you got for free? Quote:I didn't even read your posting. That explains why you are so utterly and completely unable to provide anything remotely resembling a logical argument for your case. Quote:There is nothing wrong with Aurum system. GǪaside from it having nothing but harm to the game. It was never actually finished; the NeX is still in pre-alpha; it still steals gameplay away from the game; its initial release was bungled and cost the the company a tenth of their subscribers; and here we are GÇö the second attempt to roll out stuff for it GÇö and they bungled that as well and caused you to blow a fuse over stuff you got for free. Quote:Do you think having CCP rely on "almost free-to-play" model by allowing capsuleers to fund their own subscription via ISK, sustainable in the long run? Oh dear. Don't tell me you don't understand how PLEX works. Pleeease.  Yes, it's very sustainable in the long run because accounts maintained through PLEX GÇ£for freeGÇ¥ makes CCP more money than if they were paid for with subscriptions. They're a bit more complicated from an accounting standpoint since all those outstanding services not rendered might look strange on the balance sheet, but that's about itGǪ GǪand then you wonder why we doubt your economical and financial knowledge. 
"Update: The ishukone shirt did go out accidentally. Meaning the person picking items for the offers ( me ) wasn't aware of it having been used in a PLEX promotion. Bad bad Torfi. Now that it is out and there is an issue with people that had the shirt prior as a coveted rare collectors item, we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible. Expect an update later today on the issue. It's interesting thought that it became the most popular and traded item of the new clothes we put out in Inferno 1.1.
In other news, do you think we should sell bi-monocles? An item that's essentially two monocles, one for each eye, costing as much as two monocles? I just think there's a tiny portion of players that might find it amusing to wear those. A vulgar display of, something..."
CCP t0rfifrans and CCP Spitfire disagree with your assessment. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 08:58:00 -
[106] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:CCP t0rfifrans and CCP Spitfire disagree with your assessment. Nope. Largely because you haven't read what my assessment isGǪ
"Update: The ishukone shirt did go out accidentally. Meaning the person picking items for the offers ( me ) wasn't aware of it having been used in a PLEX promotion. Bad bad Torfi. Now that it is out and there is an issue with people that had the shirt prior as a coveted rare collectors item, we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible. Expect an update later today on the issue. It's interesting thought that it became the most popular and traded item of the new clothes we put out in Inferno 1.1.
In other news, do you think we should sell bi-monocles? An item that's essentially two monocles, one for each eye, costing as much as two monocles? I just think there's a tiny portion of players that might find it amusing to wear those. A vulgar display of, something..."
CCP t0rfifrans and CCP Spitfire disagree with your assessment. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 09:07:00 -
[107] - Quote
Phill Esteen wrote:The Antiquarian, quoting Torfi, wrote:we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible this thread hasn't been locked yet, I'd say that's more than fair
Just waiting for CCP Devs' response regarding the issue of reparation. Once that's resolved and we get a clear message on their future marketing promotions, then I don't see why this thread shouldn't be locked. Until then, others can continue to spit out nonsensical crap.
And I still don't know why Tippia is writing something on the thread, because I haven't read any of his message for almost a day now. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 09:16:00 -
[108] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Just waiting for CCP Devs' response regarding the issue of reparation. GǪand the question remains: why should you be compensated for something that you got for free? Would you like a copy of the Pax Ammarria? It was free too, so that seems reasonable. Quote:And I still don't know why Tippia is writing something on the thread, because I haven't read any of his message for almost a day now. GǪand miraculously, you've managed to explain the cause of your problem to yourself. Of course, you're lying and just have problems coming up with a sensible answer, but stillGǪ
"Update: The ishukone shirt did go out accidentally. Meaning the person picking items for the offers ( me ) wasn't aware of it having been used in a PLEX promotion. Bad bad Torfi. Now that it is out and there is an issue with people that had the shirt prior as a coveted rare collectors item, we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible. Expect an update later today on the issue. It's interesting thought that it became the most popular and traded item of the new clothes we put out in Inferno 1.1.
In other news, do you think we should sell bi-monocles? An item that's essentially two monocles, one for each eye, costing as much as two monocles? I just think there's a tiny portion of players that might find it amusing to wear those. A vulgar display of, something..."
CCP t0rfifrans and CCP Spitfire disagree with your assessment. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:29:00 -
[109] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Cat Casidy wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Weaselior wrote:the antiquarian, fresh off another round of humiliating himself, pulls out the "im rich irl so clearly i can't be as dumb as anyone who can read has concluded" card again
like before, it is made out of crayon and has stains from juice spills on it I am just providing an appropriate response for a fool who keeps insisting that I am an idiot. You and your Goon pals are so funny. I think the problem with people like this is that they're so stupid that they have no idea how stupid they are. -John Cleese yeah i am sort of stumped at this point because every time i think he couldn't embarrass himself more he goes and does it
I find myself in this fascinating situation where if I were in real life, I would've never talked to a sort of trailer trash like you, but this great game of EVE brings all of us together so that we can whine and moan at each other. It's great.
You can keep calling me stupid or idiot or whatever you can think of. Once again, the 10,058 Goon tear that I was able to generate with a no-name alt, fuels me and keeps me motivated.
Goons, much appreciated for the continued interest in this thread and bumping em. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:57:00 -
[110] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:I really see no need for personal insults here. If you cannot be civil, then perhaps you should use the very handy little block function that CCP have given us so that you do not have to see certain people posting. At the rate you are going this thread will be locked and you will end up getting a warning, I'm pretty certain that will not help anyone.
Could you kindly examine the first 10 pages or so? I tried to be civil and calm but after days/weeks of having to endure personal insults from hundreds of people, I guarantee you that even Jesus couldn't handle this kind of stress.
It only requires a single response from CCP DEVS regarding how they will be making an appropriate reparation for the disadvantaged parties, and an absolute guarantee that they won't screw up with other historical items for future marketing promotion. Once ALL the demands are met, I don't see why this thread shouldn't be locked.
CCP promised us that he would provide a response a week ago. A week ago. I had to contact another CCP Dev, to find out that they are still working on a solution. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 16:08:00 -
[111] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:I really see no need for personal insults here. If you cannot be civil, then perhaps you should use the very handy little block function that CCP have given us so that you do not have to see certain people posting. At the rate you are going this thread will be locked and you will end up getting a warning, I'm pretty certain that will not help anyone. Could you kindly examine the first 10 pages or so? I tried to be civil and calm but after days/weeks of having to endure personal insults from hundreds of people, I guarantee you that even Jesus couldn't handle this kind of stress. It only requires a single response from CCP DEVS regarding how they will be making an appropriate reparation for the disadvantaged parties, and an absolute guarantee that they won't screw up with other historical items for future marketing promotion. Once ALL the demands are met, I don't see why this thread shouldn't be locked. CCP promised us that he would provide a response a week ago. A week ago. I had to contact another CCP Dev, to find out that they are still working on a solution. If their language concerns you, then use the report function. Resorting to verbal abuse and baseless insults just because others choose to is a poor excuse sir. You have other lines of communication to CCP open to you, and yet you choose to continue posting in a thread where you know people will attempt to goad you into an argument. It could be said that you were doing so on purpose, and thus any future complaint you might make regarding the behaviour of other posters would be void. Do yourself a favour, either block those people whose opinions or words cause you distress or report them to CCP. As for making demands, perhaps you should make requests instead, that way people might be less inclined to ignore you. Having worked in customer services in varying positions and in many different sectors of business, I personally would be much less likely to help someone who behaved in the manner you are displaying here.
You are absolutely right. I lost my sight for a while. I didn't even know that "blocking" function existed on EVE forum. Much appreciated for the advice. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 23:12:00 -
[112] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:
grats on your 15 minutes of fame
Hahaha you are a sad individual. I don't care about the so-called "15 minutes of fame." Obviously, extracting 10,058 Goons Tears was priceless, but I did so because unlike you guys, I actually care about this game and how it is perceived by the greater gaming communities. When we leave EVE to Goons' leadership, the only thing that will happen is to alienate potential new joiners in the long-run. Just like how you think that it was unfair of CCP to "push the bus" on Mittani the Great for enticing thousands of players to convince a mentally unstable person to commit suicide, while laughing at those who were disenfranchised by CCP's actual mistake.
Once again, 10,058 Goons Tears fuels me and gives me the daily strength to overcome Goons nonsense and completely unnecessary personal attacks. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 23:23:00 -
[113] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:..and than after acknowledging it was done in error have yet to let those affected know what to expect. GǪand the question remains: why should they expect any kind of compensation for an item that they received for free? The fair thing to do would be to let the suckers who bought it for AUR have their AUR back and keep the shirt so everyone paid the same price for it. 
A question that none of us are obligated to answer because CCP already promised some kind fo reparation.
Even if your "keychain concept" is correct, there is this other issue that CCP needs to resolve where dozens, if not, hundreds of players, paid 1.5B-2B for Ishukone Special Edition Shirt in order to use it for their avatar, only to see the pricing go down to 0.02B when CCP introduced them via NeX Store. CCP already admitted that it was a mistake and they find it just that some kind of compensation for those disenfranchised parties are in order.
CCP makes changes to various features of the game all the time that simultaneously affect pricing of certain items by 10% here and 20% there, but having to deprive collectors of many billions is something that a reputable company shouldn't do. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 03:17:00 -
[114] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:ADDENDUMISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION SHIRT & WOMENGÇÖS EXECUTOR COAT (RED/GOLD)Judging by the CCPGÇÖs recent action to remove the two highly controversial items from NEX Store, it shows CCPGÇÖs admittance on their mistake to release those two items on the NEX Store in the first place. Removing those two items is an appropriate first step, but that does not provide any reparation for those who were adversely affected by CCPGÇÖs marketing failure. Those who took the GÇ£leap of faithGÇ¥ in CCPGÇÖs are still disenfranchised by seeing billions of their initial investments on these unique shirts turned to GÇ£dustGÇ¥ due to the untold number of those shirts being circulated out into the market, thanks to CCPGÇÖs mistake of releasing those items for $0.50 on NEX Store.Obviously CCP can not take away hundreds of ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION SHIRT and WOMENGÇÖS EXECUTOR COAT (RED/GOLD) that were purchased for $0.50 post the recent patch. CCP needs to make appropriate reparations in forms of another completely unique items to the previous owners of those rare apparels. That is the only GÇ£justGÇ¥ and GÇ£equitableGÇ¥ action.
I try to keep myself calm, but this is just way too outrageous that I had to vent here again and again. You, CCP, made it sound as if ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt was only available contingent upon the purchase of 13 X PLEXs several months ago. I didn't have to, but I took the damn bait, with the expectation that CCP and its honest marketing department will maintain the "uniqueness" and rarity of these special items. But you decide to reward those who took that "extra leap of faith" by treating us like ***** and dingleberries and having these same items available for 50 cents each several months later. Where is fairness in this? CCP, You should have MADE IT ADAMANTLY CLEAR FROM THE BEGINNING THAT AFTER 6 MONTHS, THESE SPECIAL ITEMS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR 50 CENTS EACH! CCP should make appropriate reparation by rewarding the previous faithful ISHUKONE SPECIAL SHIRT owners with other equivalent UNIQUE items. Prior to this debacle, the shirt had a market value of approximately 2B. Now, it costs 20 million to purchase (although the price increased after CCP decided to stop the sale of Ishukone, the current market price is 1/10th of the original market value of 2B). So far, this has been the message that CCP has indirectly expressed to all the supporters of Noble Exchange, cash for PLEXs, and all other marketing schemes: "Thank you for your contribution. You assumed the risk and this is what you get. You will be the laughing stock of the entire community of EVE Online. We will remain mute for the rest of the period. Oh!! And don't forget: we are here sitting behind the desk, laughing at you too!"Please refer to the following post on the Market Discussion for those who were adversely affected by CCP's recent flooding of pre-existing rare/unique outfits on NEX Store for fraction of their initial costs. CCP aren't required to gaurantee the value of your speculations. Get over it.
Please read CCP's response before posting. CCP already claimed that the reissuance of those cosmetic shirts were their mistakes and promised us with some kind of equitable compensation. All I am doing here now, is waiting for CCP Devs' actual responses.
The question of whether I made a good or bad investment shouldn't be mentioned over and over again.
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 16:38:00 -
[115] - Quote
It's weekend now. Still waiting for the CCP Dev's response. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 16:59:00 -
[116] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:CCP Phantom wrote:Off topic and trolling removed. There is no need for any discussions that the release of the Ishukone shirt was a mistake and shouldn't have happened, CCP t0rfifrans stated that already in clear words. I would like to remind everyone to stay polite and constructive in their replies, forum rule violations and personal attacks will not be allowed. Thanks for reminding us that that post exists. He also stated in that same post: Quote:Now that it is out and there is an issue with people that had the shirt prior as a coveted rare collectors item, we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible. Expect an update later today on the issue. I might politely mention that "later today" is long past and we have yet to hear anything. This is the concern that the non trolls have been trying to get an answer to. Would you be so kind as to supply us with the reason we have not heard anything? Mr Epeen 
Also very anxious to hear the Dev's response. It's already been more than a week. I believe we waited long enough. =/ |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 19:08:00 -
[117] - Quote
There are still many dozens, if not, hundreds, of the players who saw their investment on these Ishukone Shirts & Women's Executor (Red/Gold) devalued from 2B ISK to 0.022B (22 million) ISK as a result of CCP's grave mistake. (Personally, I had 3 shirts which equate to approximately 6B in losses --> I am sure there are MANY MORE who were adversely affected by this nonsensical devaluation as well).
There are many who owned several of these ISHUKONE shirts who had significant ISK tied up to this investment. Please provide us with your decision regarding this issue on reparation as soon as possible. It has been a week since you promised us an official answer. Please make this happen. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 19:18:00 -
[118] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:There are still many dozens, if not, hundreds, of the players who saw their investment on these Ishukone Shirts & Women's Executor (Red/Gold) devalued from 2B ISK to 0.022B (22 million) ISK as a result of CCP's grave mistake. (Personally, I had 3 shirts which equate to approximately 6B in losses --> I am sure there are MANY MORE who were adversely affected by this nonsensical devaluation as well).
There are many who owned several of these ISHUKONE shirts who had significant ISK tied up to this investment. Please provide us with your decision regarding this issue on reparation as soon as possible. It has been a week since you promised us an official answer. Please make this happen. You keep admitting that it's an investment. Sometimes you can lose money on investments, especially when they have nothing but numismatic value.
Lets assume that you purchased 3 Estamel modules for 2.2B each a day before, totaling 6.6B in investment. Then without a single warning, CCP decides to make those precious Estamel modules of yours, available for 1/100 of the original price you paid. Having lost approximately 6.5B in investments, you would be equally enraged and most likely, you will cancel your subscription.
CCP admitted that having those Ishukone & Women's Executor (Red/Gold) re-issued on NeX store for mere fraction of the original market value, was a mistake. I understand that you disagree with my sentiment, but what are you trying to achieve by keep telling everyone that we, the players, should solely assume the cost of CCP's mistake? CCP promised a reparation. Could you say something that is more productive than saying "you don't deserve this" over and over again? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 19:37:00 -
[119] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:There are still many dozens, if not, hundreds, of the players who saw their investment on these Ishukone Shirts & Women's Executor (Red/Gold) devalued from 2B ISK to 0.022B (22 million) ISK as a result of CCP's grave mistake. (Personally, I had 3 shirts which equate to approximately 6B in losses --> I am sure there are MANY MORE who were adversely affected by this nonsensical devaluation as well).
There are many who owned several of these ISHUKONE shirts who had significant ISK tied up to this investment. Please provide us with your decision regarding this issue on reparation as soon as possible. It has been a week since you promised us an official answer. Please make this happen. You keep admitting that it's an investment. Sometimes you can lose money on investments, especially when they have nothing but numismatic value. Lets assume that you purchased 3 Estamel modules for 2.2B each a day before, totaling 6.6B in investment. Then without a single warning, CCP decides to make those precious Estamel modules of yours, available for 1/100 of the original price you paid. Having lost approximately 6.5B in investments, you would be equally enraged and most likely, you will cancel your subscription. CCP admitted that having those Ishukone & Women's Executor (Red/Gold) re-issued on NeX store for mere fraction of the original market value, was a mistake. I understand that you disagree with my sentiment, but what are you trying to achieve by keep telling everyone that we, the players, should solely assume the cost of CCP's mistake? CCP promised a reparation. Could you say something that is more productive than saying "you don't deserve this" over and over again? I'd be happily fitting them to my ship, because I wasn't silly enough to make an investment into a commodity with nothing aside from its numismatic value. You lost money on an Investment. You thought you were going to make money on it. You lost out on an investment. That happens, and that's why it's an investment.
You forgot to mention the point that if 3 of your Estamel modules' market value dropped from 6.6B to 0.06B, you would most likely be equally enraged and rage-quitted your subscription.
You keep claiming that Estamel and Ishukone shirts are different. They are not. You would've held Estamel not only because it is a powerful module, but also, because it has an investment value. Ishuokone Special Edition Shirt was a "powerful shirt (awesome fashion statement that provides immeasurable feeling of bliss for certain roleplayers or collectors!!!)" that has an investment value as well. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 19:56:00 -
[120] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:You forgot to mention the point that if 3 of your Estamel modules' market value dropped from 6.6B to 0.06B, you would most likely be equally enraged and rage-quitted your subscription. He probably didn't forget it. He just wouldn't do it. After all, why would he? Quote:You keep claiming that Estamel and Ishukone shirts are different. Where did he claim anything of the kind?
Tippia, I have questions for you.
Lets assume that you purchased 3 Estamel Modules that have maintained market value of 2.2B each, totaling approximately 6.6B. Then one day, without a warning, CCP decided to make those same Estamel Modules available for 1/100th of the original price you paid. In a single hour, you see your 6.6B in net worth, decline to pitiful 66 million ISK. Are you going to just smile, act like nothing happened, and keep going on with your daily EVE Online life? |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 20:06:00 -
[121] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Lets assume that you purchased 3 Estamel Modules that have maintained market value of 2.2B each, totaling approximately 6.6B. Then one day, without a warning, CCP decided to make those same Estamel Modules available for 1/100th of the original price you paid. In a single hour, you see your 6.6B in net worth, decline to pitiful 66 million ISK. Are you going to just smile, act like nothing happened, and keep going on with your daily EVE Online life? Yes. Why wouldn't I? Estamels for 66M GÇö cheap enough to fit on just about anything that is worth protecting (and which, with Estamels, will now be very well protected) GÇö what's not to like?
Ok obviously you and I think very differently. Let me try another example. Lets say U.S. Government had you buy Bear Sterns company for $20 billion. Then without a warning, the same government introduced a regulation that decreased the value of the firm from $20 billion to $20 million. Are you telling me that without a doubt, you will be content with the situation and you will have no single thread of grudge against this dilema? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 20:12:00 -
[122] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Ok obviously you and I think very differently. Let me try another example. Lets say U.S. Government had you buy Bear Sterns company for $20 billion. GǪwhich would make it completely unlike what is going on here, so that's a red herring.
Unlikely, but it is a similar analogy. Could you answer my question? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 20:21:00 -
[123] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Ok obviously you and I think very differently. Let me try another example. Lets say U.S. Government had you buy Bear Sterns company for $20 billion. GǪwhich would make it completely unlike what is going on here, so that's a red herring. Unlikely, but it is a similar analogy. Could you answer my question? She didn't say "unlikely" she said "unlike" This item was given away for free. The market price for it stabilized at some value due to whatever. The correct analogy would be if the Government gave people a Pony for free if they did some other action, then started selling Ponies to other people for a nickel. If, between those times, you bought a pony for something more than a nickel, you lost at your investment. Too bad, so sad.
So you are telling me that those who spent 2B for Ishukone Shirt prior to the devaluation, shouldn't be compensated because that's part of the market risk? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 20:23:00 -
[124] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Unlikely, but it is a similar analogy. Could you answer my question? It's not similar because no-one had you do anything. You chose to take the risk of your own volition. As such, while I can answer the question, it is of no relevance to the topic at hand.
Oh let me restate my question then. Lets say the government made it sound as if Bear Stern was a decent investment. Does this make you happy now? You are telling me that you will be ok if your investment turns to dust? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 20:28:00 -
[125] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Straw man, deflection and denial. Where is the strawman? Where is the deflection? What am I denying? Why can't you show where I'm telling the OP and the devs that they are wrong? The Antiquarian wrote:So you are telling me that those who spent 2B for Ishukone Shirt prior to the devaluation, shouldn't be compensated because that's part of the market risk? Actually, you are essentially saying that because you insist on calling it an investment. Investments occasionally fail to generate a return (or even pay themselves back), you knowGǪ
Tippia, are you saying that those who purchased the Shirt prior to this artificial devaluation by CCP's own mistake, doesn't deserve any compensation? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 20:35:00 -
[126] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Tippia, are you saying that those who purchased the Shirt prior to this artificial devaluation by CCP's own mistake, doesn't deserve any compensation? Why would they? They either got it for free, or they got what they paid for, or they gambled and lost.
So you are telling me that if you purchased Estamel's module for 2.2B and its market value declines to 22M the next day solely from the artificial devaluation caused by CCP's mistake, you won't care? That you will act like nothing happened? You will consider that as part of the risk and move on without asking CCP for any compensation? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 02:14:00 -
[127] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:You mean the artificial rarity that CCP has confirmed to be intended? On an item that was confirmed by CCP to be a one time promotional item?
I can't be bothered to link anymore than I can with the other troll How is it a troll to explain the basic risk of the GÇ£investmentGÇ¥ the OP made? How does what the devs said in any way affect the fact that the OP made the decision to take that risk? You can quote the devs as much as you like, but just like with my question (that neither of you have been able to answer), it doesn't actually address the point being made.
Once again, the way you and I think are so different that we will never be able to come up with compromising answer that is mutually agreeable by both of us. Just because the way we think is different, doesn't necessary mean one is right and other is wrong.
I label all ingame items that exist in EVE Online as "investments" because they are means to not only maintain the value of our initial capital, but to yield additional returns. As you claim, you are absolutely right that just like any other investments, these assets carry risk where they could also yield negative return. But at the same time, we are not strictly abiding by the Finance-concept of risk because we do not keep these items purely for finance-investment & speculative purpose.
Our purpose extends beyond that. We hold these unique items to satisfy our innate desires as collectors. You also believe in EVE Online being a sandbox where a player could do anything he or she wants? EVE throws a rubric cube at us and it's up to us to decide what the **** to do with it. Perhaps speculation is an unavoidable evil in collecting profession, but we are not holding these unique items just for the sole purpose of seeing our net worth go up. What we ask is some form of "stability" that CCP has generously provided to other professions.
We consider "collecting" as a legitimate profession and the only thing we ask is for CCP to give as much respect to our profession as it does to any other professions in EVE including PvPing, Roleplaying, and PvEing missioners. One way for CCP to legitimize and give equal weight to our profession is to provide a stable environment where our collection doesn't go under water. Have you seen an instance where without a single warning, CCP deprived countless hours of PvPers' collective effort by making the power of the super-capitals equal to that of cruisers? Have you seen an instance where a missioner was deprived of countless hours he put into faction standing by having CCP announce without a warning, that you are only entitled only to level 1 mission? Have you ever seen an instance where CCP ban the provision of outside services to obtain ISK (including corp logo creation, killmail systems, teamspeak for payment), etc, without warning? From time to time, CCP does make continuous changes to the preexisting gameplay that positively or negatively affect players' gameplay, but what CCP did with Ishukone shirt/Women (Gold/red) was not just a small change, but an utter devaluation of something we cherish. We are not merely holding these items for speculation purpose. We hold these unique items because we enjoy collecting and we have a belief that CCP won't do anything to **** over "our profession."
If you can't see the difference, then I have nothing more to say to you. You can keep playing word games of yours, but I can't guarantee you that I will be reading any more of your postings.
CCP already admitted that reissuance of Ishukone Shirt and Women's Executor (Red/Gold) was a grave mistake on CCP's part and they will be providing the disadvantaged parties with appropriate compensation. You can keep telling everyone that we do not deserve a single compensation, but CCP already disagrees with you on that. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 07:52:00 -
[128] - Quote
Mechael wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:You forgot to mention the point that if 3 of your Estamel modules' market value dropped from 6.6B to 0.06B, you would most likely be equally enraged and rage-quitted your subscription.
You keep claiming that Estamel and Ishukone shirts are different. They are not. You would've held Estamel not only because it is a powerful module, but also, because it has an investment value. Ishuokone Special Edition Shirt is a "powerful shirt (awesome fashion statement that provides immeasurable feeling of bliss for certain roleplayers or collectors!!!)" that has an investment value as well. Couldn't be more wrong here, because I actually like EVE for other reasons than the stuff I have in it. The nature of EVE is what keeps me here. So long as I've got a shiny new ibis and a golden mining laser of hope, I'm good. The sandbox is mine. Losing is all part of the fun, and often times even more fun than winning when there's a great story attached.
I wholeheartedly agree. Losing 6.6B worth of investment is great when the loss stems from Goons suicide ganking and it makes a terrific story and I would even compliment Goons for a job well done.
But when I lose 6.6B because of CCP's carelessness mistake, there is nothing glorious about that. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 09:48:00 -
[129] - Quote
Tippia wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:From time to time, CCP does make continuous changes to the preexisting gameplay that positively or negatively affect players' gameplay, but what CCP did with Ishukone shirt/Women (Gold/red) was not just a small change, but an utter devaluation of something we cherish. We are not merely holding these items for speculation purpose. We hold these unique items because we enjoy collecting and we have a belief that CCP won't do anything to **** over "our profession." The difference is that your collection is completely untouched, as is, by and large, you GÇ£professionGÇ¥. You still have your item. It still performs the exact same function. As such, it is completely unlike the incomparables you listed GÇö the nerfed cruisers or removed standings or removed meta-functionality are all just that: removed functionality. Your shirt remains functionally identical and hasn't been changed in the slightest. Yes, you could argue that its value changed, but then you're talking as a speculator, in which case I have to inform you that this is an insignificantly minute change compared to the vast speculation losses that have been caused by CCP's game changes over the years (cf. the dysproGåÆtech bottleneck changeover; the PI changes; any mineral adjustment ever made; hell, pretty much any adjustment ever to a set of raw materials). So that's why we continuously arrive back at that same old question: why should they compensate you for something you got for free? If you're a collector, nothing is lost. If you're a speculator, then that's the name of the game GÇö better luck next time.
I gave my explanations again and again, for the past week and half, but obviously you are refusing to read anything anyone says. There is only one response to our trolling and that is using the ignore function on you.
Please do keep posting something because this thread definitely needs continuous bumping. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 10:19:00 -
[130] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
This is great. I did not realize that silence could feel this good. Tippia, I suggest that you stop writing nonsense and just wait until CCP provides us with the response. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 10:48:00 -
[131] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.08 11:32:00 -
[132] - Quote
Still waiting for the response from CCP. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 04:19:00 -
[133] - Quote
Virgil Travis wrote:Malcanis wrote:How in the name of a loving God did this thread reach 27 pages?  Internet Space shirts is serious business.
Very very serious. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 10:51:00 -
[134] - Quote
Happy Monday, my dear CCP Devs!!!!!!!!
What does it take to get the CCP Devs response that was promised a week and half ago? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 15:00:00 -
[135] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Alaura Aquila wrote: Will the shirts we bought for 500 Aur be deleted after the "fix"?
Nope! Thank you for providing us with prompt responses. In that case, could you kindly let us know what is being planned to provide a fair and appropriate compensation for the investors who were disenfranchised by the devaluation of their investments on Ishukone Special Edition & Women's Executor (Red/Gold)? Wouldn't it be only fair that we are compensated for another set of unique items currently non-existant in the market as part of returning our financials to the previous status while simultaneously providing us with the reparation for all the inconvenience this issue has caused? I am working with Torfi to resolve this situation for everyone as quickly as possible. As this affects several hundred pilots we want to make sure that we are doing it right and as fairly to everyone as possible. There are two different scenarios here and the issue of the Ishukone shirt and Executor coat are different. I will explain why: Ishukone Sterling Shirt - Issued over a very specific time frame. This item should only be valid for pilots who participated in the PLEX offer which happened in October 2011. Women's Executor Coat -Part of the Russian Collectors edition which is still in circulation. While still a rare item, there will be more added to the game naturally as more people pick up a copy of the Russian box. I will aim to provide an update tomorrow on exactly what we plan to do. That plan is almost final, however, I do not want to state something which may change in the next 24 hours.
Dear CCP Navigator and CCP t0rfifrans, it's been a week and half and we still haven't received any response regarding this issue. Could you kindly keep us updated on what is going on? Waiting for a day was already hard enough. Waiting for another week? =/ |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 15:03:00 -
[136] - Quote
Yagutsa wrote:******* nerd
Coming from someone who spends equal amount of time pvping and fulfilling his ego out of it, I find it laughable.
We are all nerds. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 15:29:00 -
[137] - Quote
AndromacheDarkstar wrote:Destination SkillQueue wrote:So what you're saying is, that investing in virtual goods owned by a corporation you have no control over might not be a wise move. I can see why you're upset and hope CCP doesn't make a habit of making special edition items common, but I just can't get that upset with you over a shirt especially, since the shirt was a bonus gift given on top of a normal purchase of a PLEX packet.  If im honest i could be bothered to read through all fo the posts here but i think this one pretty much sums up a perfect response and its done on the front page. Your upset over a virtual shirt, that was given away as a free gift, for buying something else you got use out of. Get over it. "Listen up, maggots. You are not special. You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake. You're the same decaying organic matter as everything else."
What's there to argue regarding the validity of my points? CCP already told us that reissuance of ISHUKONE Shirt was a mistake on their part and assured us that some kind of reparation will be provided.
I am just waiting here, waiting for CCP's promised answer. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:19:00 -
[138] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
CCP, please provide us with your responses so we can all move on. Having to read hundreds of trollin posts... oh man... |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:23:00 -
[139] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
Still waiting for Dev's response. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:30:00 -
[140] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Tippia wrote:So you agree, then. That's awfully kind of you, especially after having been banging on about how they ruined your investment. One would have thought you meant compensation for yourself after all that, rather than for those who lost actual currency.  There must be some medical term for people who continue to talk to people who are, in no uncertain terms, not listening to them. Mr Epeen 
Why did you have to quote Tippia the Troll? Now I ended up reading his senseless posting. =(
Still seeking for Devs' response that was promised a week and half ago. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 03:26:00 -
[141] - Quote
still waiting for CCP Devs' response. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:25:00 -
[142] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Keep waiting.
All your postings do nothing, but to incite annoyance from the parties adversely affected by CCP's mistake.
I believe that falls in line with the very definition of being a troll and as such, I must "ignore" your postings as well.
Please do keep the bumps up though. I can't be on 24/7. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 07:46:00 -
[143] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:12. Spamming, bumping and pyramid quoting are prohibited. Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users. This includes GÇ£firstGÇ¥ and GÇ£go back to [another game]GÇ¥ posts. Bumping posts in order to keep them near the top of the list is also prohibited. Petitions or "/signed" posts are a version of bumping and likewise are not permitted. Pyramid quoting is a response to a forum thread that contains the quotes of four or more previous posters, sometimes with additional spaces added unnecessarily. Posts of this nature are not conducive to community spirit and are unwelcome. Too bad you didn't find that rule before you were banned. People might have actually taken you seriously. Or not. Mr Epeen  I for the most part posted off topic, substantial threads. Just because they were locked claiming "Spam" doesn't mean they fit that definition. They were against the rules, sure, but they weren't SpamAnd CCP seems to have taken us seriously. So it seems to have worked. Anyway, this is off topic (like most of the OP's recent posts). OP: What is the appropriate recompense for something given away for free?
CCP Devs already mentioned that they have devised a plan that would provide fair compensation for all the affected parties. It's just that CCP Devs were probably too busy with Alliance Tournaments to implement that plan.
I am just here, asking CCP to expedite on providing a response that was promised a week and half ago.
I suggest you wait for CCP's response and question the fairness of CCP's decision then. I've provided my opinion/answers and you guys provided your opinions more than hundreds of times. If you take the time to read everything, all our answers are given and we are just fighting over and over again because of our differences in value system.
Once again, I suggest that you wait for CCP's response before spamming another repetitious "stuff."
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 08:42:00 -
[144] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: I am just here, asking CCP to expedite on providing a response that was promised a week and half ago. Having been promised a response, I think we are entitled to be more vigilant in asking CCP since they do tend to forget these matters.
Given the response time for most petitions, waiting a week and a half for a response is about par, you should be more patient.
You are right, but I am just afraid that CCP Devs, overran by work and Alliance Tournaments, will forget to do anything about it. That's why I am asking for responses. This is CCP Navigator's forum response that we got on June 28th, which was approximately a week and half ago:
"I will aim to provide an update tomorrow on exactly what we plan to do. That plan is almost final, however, I do not want to state something which may change in the next 24 hours."
They made it sound as if the plan was finalized pending a review, but obviously that isn't the case. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:58:00 -
[145] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Ok, so here is the much delayed update. I am sorry that this has taken so long but we needed to run through a seriously complicated process to track down each unique shirt issued before June 25. So here are the steps that will happen over the next few days to finalize this issue: 1, We will issue the following people a 'Mens Field Marshall Coat': * Those players who took the PLEX offer in October and kept their shirt based on its exclusivity. * Players who bought the shirt from an original owner on the basis that it would be an exclusive item. Again, if the owner sold it on then the person who ultimately ended up with the shirt based on owning an exclusive item. if you received the shirt and sold it or traded for a profit you will not receive this new item. 2, We are updating the item description for this jacket and this will be deployed in the next day or two. Once that deployment takes place we will redeem the item to all relevant account holders. Once this happens i will update the thread letting you know that the item is ready to be redeemed. There are some edge cases involved with this of players who may have their shirt stored in secure containers or containers in space. These players will need to s ubmit a petition to verify ownership. It is difficult to give the perfect resolution in cases of this nature and we feel that this resolution benefits the greater number. Thank you for your patience during this time.
Thank you for your response, but I believe this brings more questions than answers. You specified that we will be receiving "Mens Field Marshall Coat." That already exist in the NeX Store with an equivalent price tag of 800M or so. Ishukone Shirt's market value prior to the devaluation was 2B. Arn't we still shorthanded? You claimed before that a solution is in place that would provide a fair compensation for the affected parties. If what we are receiving, are the same Mens Field Marshall Coat that is purchasable for 800M, then I am not sure if there's fairness in this.
Or as Rikula asked, are the "Mens Field Marshall Coat" going to be a different version of the pre-existing ones? The current one is yellow. Are we going to be receiving something that is unique? You did mention that "description" will change, so can we hope that we will be receiving a unique Shirt that is completely different from the preexisting one?
Also, is there a safe control in place so that this does not happen again?
Hope to hear from you soon! |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 15:45:00 -
[146] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
Are the Field Marshalls' Coat that you mentioned, same as the pre-existing ones? What do you mean when you say "description will be changed?" So we are getting new unique coats? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
514
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 04:56:00 -
[147] - Quote
We are sorry for having to ask you several dozens more of questions, but CCP Navigator, what kind of control system do you have in place, to prevent this kind of mistake from reoccurring?
Also what is the future course of the EVE Online's future marketing promotion? Are you going to be reusing any other historical items? Or do we have to live in a constant fear that after having to partake in the promotion to obtain those items, those items will be devalued by future circulation? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
514
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 16:31:00 -
[148] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:Still lots to be answered
I think if we don't hear any response in a day or so, then most likely, we have to wait for another week and half.
Thank you very much for your response yesterday CCP Navigator though! |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
515
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 07:37:00 -
[149] - Quote
Carles Ormande wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:We are sorry for having to ask you several dozens more of questions, but CCP Navigator, what kind of control system do you have in place, to prevent this kind of mistake from reoccurring?
Also what is the future course of the EVE Online's future marketing promotion? Are you going to be reusing any other historical items? Or do we have to live in a constant fear that after having to partake in the promotion to obtain those items, those items will be devalued by future circulation? Does that keep you up at night?
Of course! |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 18:00:00 -
[150] - Quote
PinkKnife wrote:Wow, some people need to learn to not look a gift horse in the mouth. You're lucky CCP is doing anything for you since your entire claim on this is sketchy. CCP doesn't owe you anything because the perceived value in a digital economy of a marketing promotion tanked.
No. Just like other reputable gaming companies (yes, Blizzard), CCP should uphold the rarity of these items for future success of their marketing promotions. If they say "limited this, special that" in one offer, and then make it available for dirt cheap half a year later, disincentives potential customers from ever participating in the marketing promotions in the future. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 19:00:00 -
[151] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:PinkKnife wrote:Wow, some people need to learn to not look a gift horse in the mouth. You're lucky CCP is doing anything for you since your entire claim on this is sketchy. CCP doesn't owe you anything because the perceived value in a digital economy of a marketing promotion tanked. No. Just like other reputable gaming companies (yes, Blizzard), CCP should uphold the rarity of these items for future success of their marketing promotions. If they say "limited this, special that" in one offer, and then make it available for dirt cheap half a year later, disincentives potential customers from ever participating in the marketing promotions in the future. So, did you not get the Plexes that came with your $300 T-Shirt?
Once again, it was a tied arrangement where CCP advertised the promotion as if the only venue to obtain the Ishukone Shirt was to purchase 13 x PLEXs. Also it specified that the deal was a "one-time offer" which added validity to the expectation that the Shirt will not be available via other venues on an indefinite basis.
I did not have to purchase 39 Plexs, but I did so because of the promotion advertised above. Sure, PLEXs were later used to help fund my other collecting binge, but it took significant time for me to use it. The costs associated with purchasing 39 PLEXs at once included Postponement of purchase and the possibility of gaining index interest. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 19:16:00 -
[152] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: Once again, it was a tied arrangement where CCP advertised the promotion as if the only venue to obtain the Ishukone Shirt was to purchase 13 x PLEXs. Also it specified that the deal was a "one-time offer" which added validity to the expectation that the Shirt will not be available via other venues on an indefinite basis.
I did not have to purchase 39 Plexs, but I did so because of the promotion advertised above. Sure, PLEXs were later used to help fund my other collecting binge, but it took significant time for me to use it. The costs associated with purchasing 39 PLEXs at once included Postponement of purchase and the possibility of gaining index interest.
One time offer means exactly that. The Offer is only available at that time. They didn't say "One Time Item." You're complaining about a McDonalds re-release of a Happy Meal toy.
No. McDonald's never re-release same toys with their Happy Meal promotion. Reputable companies like McDonald's understand that by having to reissue same items, the impact of their marketing promotions go down. Also they understand that there are serious collectors out there who collect these toys. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 19:39:00 -
[153] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
I admire your tenacity Tippia. Despite the fact that I haven't read your posts for the last 4-5 days, you still write something on my wall.
Either you are like a roach, or as a respected member of this forum community pointed out, someone with a severe mental condition. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 19:41:00 -
[154] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: Once again, it was a tied arrangement where CCP advertised the promotion as if the only venue to obtain the Ishukone Shirt was to purchase 13 x PLEXs. Also it specified that the deal was a "one-time offer" which added validity to the expectation that the Shirt will not be available via other venues on an indefinite basis.
I did not have to purchase 39 Plexs, but I did so because of the promotion advertised above. Sure, PLEXs were later used to help fund my other collecting binge, but it took significant time for me to use it. The costs associated with purchasing 39 PLEXs at once included Postponement of purchase and the possibility of gaining index interest.
One time offer means exactly that. The Offer is only available at that time. They didn't say "One Time Item." You're complaining about a McDonalds re-release of a Happy Meal toy. No. McDonald's never re-release same toys with their Happy Meal promotion. Reputable companies like McDonald's understand that by having to reissue same items, the impact of their marketing promotions go down. Also they understand that there are serious collectors out there who collect these toys. What interest does McDonalds have in the secondary market? McDonalds may not re-release toys, but that's because at the scale they operate, the R&D money to create a new set rounds down to 0 (and offers the advantage of selling promotional rights. $$). Neither of those apply to CCP (which has a long history of re-releasing the free tchotchkes they give away). You're still complaining about a free tchotchke given to you with an otherwise unrelated purchase. You got the Plex, you got a screaming deal on the Plex, and you got the exclusive use of a free tchotchke. You still have the tchotchke.
As specified before, the cost of postponement and the loss of index interests that could've been accrued from the capital spent on PLEXs is quite substantial. Yes, I got my PLEXs to support my collecting binge, but it took quite a while to spend all 39 PLEXs. There was absolutely no need for me to purchase all those PLEXs, all at once. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 20:01:00 -
[155] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Actually, that honor falls to the OP, who read mountains of meaning where none existed.
CCP disagrees with your nonsensical rambling. CCP already admitted their mistakes. We are still here because although CCP Navigator was kind enough to provide us with a resolution, ambiguity still exists in his answer. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2012.07.15 14:08:00 -
[156] - Quote
Rikula wrote:Have the items been added yet? I haven't had any redeemable items, but then I'm one of those people with the shirt in a container.
Unfortunately, no. =( |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
517
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 13:02:00 -
[157] - Quote
Still waiting |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
520
|
Posted - 2012.07.17 01:58:00 -
[158] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:My extremely important apothesis question, to be precise. I also want recompense for my Apotheosis being devalued. Also my Primae, and all the other One Time offers that have been reissued.
You are absolutely right! I suggest you keep your campaign on this thread. Thanks! |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
531
|
Posted - 2012.07.18 14:14:00 -
[159] - Quote
Greetings CCP Devs, we hope that you guys are having a fantastic summer break.
Could you kindly provide us with an update on this issue? Also there are so many questions unanswered. We would be greatly appreciated if you could kindly provide us with answers and talk to us before steam-rolling with the changes that might keep many of the affected parties not fully appeased.
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 10:43:00 -
[160] - Quote
It's been more than 3 weeks. Could CCP kindly provide us with an update on all our questions before you guys steam-roll everything on the 8th week (around pg. 26). |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:16:00 -
[161] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Quote:Disclaimer: Everything in this dev blog (just like every game change we make) is open to being changed at any point. If you dump all your isk into speculation around this blog and lose it all because we changed something again, you have only yourself to blame. Always speculate at your own risk. There it is.
And I assume CCP stated that? Oh that's right. I didn't think so.
Where do you get the tenacity to troll on the same messages over and over again when CCP Devs already admitted that the reissuance of Ishukone & Women's executor (Red/Gold) was a complete mistake? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:22:00 -
[162] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:KrakizBad wrote:Quote:Disclaimer: Everything in this dev blog (just like every game change we make) is open to being changed at any point. If you dump all your isk into speculation around this blog and lose it all because we changed something again, you have only yourself to blame. Always speculate at your own risk. There it is. And I assume CCP stated that? Oh that's right. I didn't think so. Where do you get the tenacity to troll on the same messages over and over again when CCP Devs already admitted that the reissuance of Ishukone & Women's executor (Red/Gold) was a complete mistake? Click devblog, read devblog, remove foot from mouth.
I am not going to waste my time searching for your precious devblog information because it specifically states that the information pertains to the "devblog." We are not talking about devblog here. The shirts were never mentioned in the Devblog. These were promotional items given and CCP already admitted their mistake in their reissuance. Why do you keep writing nonsensical posts? Great job trying to support your argument with something that has nothing to do with what we are discussing here. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:30:00 -
[163] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Clearly what's good for Tech doesn't apply to Space Barbie.
I suggest you learn how to use source documents appropriately before spitting out your trolling comments again and again. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 16:40:00 -
[164] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Perhaps you could teach a course on reading source documents and deciphering advertising.
I sure will. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 16:58:00 -
[165] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I hpe this thread is still going in a year, with the OP making plaintive "57 weeks and still waiting, CCP Navigator!" posts.
I think you will get your wish come true. I feel like that will be the case. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 21:27:00 -
[166] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:I for one hope that the OP continue to do blunders like this and rage about his inability to connect the dots on this forum.
Inability to connect the dots on the forum? The CCP already admitted that it was a mistake on its part to reissue these vanity items. What part do you not understand?
Awesome job on reading the last 5 posts of the entire 31 page thread and spitting out nonsensical ramblings regarding "my inability to connect the dots." I understand that the last time you read a book was Dr. Seuss'. I know it is pretty tough to read a 31 page posting, but do not despair. You can do it! |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 08:23:00 -
[167] - Quote
Still waiting for the response. Please kindly provide us with answers before steam-rolling the changes. =/ |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 16:26:00 -
[168] - Quote
B1ade wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:It's been more than 3 weeks. Could CCP kindly provide us with an update on all our questions before you guys steam-roll everything on the 8th week (around pg. 26). When your done with this and rage quit, can I have your stuff? I think id look pretty good in your now very common T-shirt.
I don't think you can handle the magnitude of handling big wealth. Just like those folks who either kill themselves or are plagued by marital problems after winning million dollar lotteries, I fear for a similar fate when i give you my "stuff." There is a reason why poor people stay poor. I suggest that you be content with whatever you got. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 16:40:00 -
[169] - Quote
Rer Eirikr wrote:And I suggest you give it a rest about a virtual T-shirt that you bought with real money and figured you could speculate on, even if it was mistakenly placed on the market.
Speculate? I made reasonable assumption that CCP will never reintroduce these items via alternative venues for 1/30th of the market value to the general populous. Usually, a reputable company such as Blizzard, means what they claim when an ingame item is advertised as a "one-time offer." I made a logical assumption that seeing how CCP is one of the most reputable game company in the industry, it would hold similar stance. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 17:59:00 -
[170] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Not that this is the least bit surprising, but does anyone else find it amusing that the three trolls on this page are the ones keeping this thread that they claim to want to die...alive? Mr Epeen  nobody wants this thread to die the antiquarian's temper tantrums and attempts to pretend to be wealthy are one of the funniest things on eve-o in a long time
Surely, this can't be possibly funnier than your Dear Leader, enticing thousands of players to encourage a person to commit suicide? I was laughing my ass off while seeking your Kim Jung Il equivalent's resignation. Do not worry. My so called "temper tatnrums" is fueled by 10,058 Goon tears. You keep up the great work with bumping this thread. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 18:16:00 -
[171] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
Tippia, I am starting to admire your godly patience. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 18:24:00 -
[172] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
Once again, much appreciated for your contentless bump. You are the kind of folks that I need to keep this thread alive. Please continue to do an awesome job keeping this thread on the front page so it gets the CCP's attention.
Maybe once this ordeal is over, I will send you 1 million ISK for your excellent work. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 18:33:00 -
[173] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
Once again, much appreciated for your contentless bump. You are the kind of folks that I need to keep this thread alive. Please continue to do an awesome job keeping this thread on the front page so that it gets the CCP's attention.
Maybe once this ordeal is over, I will send you 1 million ISK for your excellent work. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 18:37:00 -
[174] - Quote
Aight Tippia and Evil S.A., I need to go to sleep so I can go on a trip with my girlfriend tomorrow. I expect you guys to keep this thread alive and bumped on the front page of the forum during my absence. Keep up the excellent work for the next two days.
Once again, we are greatly appreciated for your hard work. Once all our issues are addressed by CCP, I will make appropriate compensations for all your hard work. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 18:43:00 -
[175] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:"this ordeal" laffo
And Evil S.A., do not forget! 10,058 Goon tears gives me the daily strength I need to fend off your trolling posts! |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:06:00 -
[176] - Quote
You keep claiming that I am bumping this thread with "content-free" postings. I was just responding content-free inquiries made by numerous others with appropriate content-free responses. I suggest you start from the scratch and note that we've provided actual answers to all these "content-free" questions that you guys were so keen on asking for the past three weeks.
Once again, receiving a minuscule discount over the PLEXs does not outweigh the costs including the postponement of purchases and the loss of potential cash flow derived from investing the money on other investments that provide index returns.
Once again, there was absolutely no reason for me to have hundreds of dollars of cash tied to PLEXs that I won't be able to spend for the next several years.
But most importantly, the crux of my thread and ranting has implications beyond me moaning and bitching about the loss of market value. How CCP responses to this issue will ultimately determine the effectiveness of the marketing promotion in the future. If CCP will make these special ingame items available for merely hundredth of fraction of the initial "tied-in" arrangements or the costs, several months after each marketing promotions, then the effectiveness of the marketing promotions will diminish as the potential cash spenders will realize that it only takes several months of idling to obtain these unique ingame items. What incentives are there if it takes nearly no effort (relative to what it takes to get the items via "tied-in" arrangements) to obtain these items again for 10-20M ISK?
You guys can ridicule my investment decisions all day long, but once again, I made a logical assumption that seeing how CCP is a reputable game company, when CCP said "one-time offer," I took it literally as a "one-time offer." Blizzard did so for the past 7 years without making that definition ambiguous. Why shouldn't CCP do the same?
CCP Devs already acknowledged that the reissuance of these unique shirts was a complete mistake. Why are you still being insistant on proving the flaws in my logic? That is called trolling. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:33:00 -
[177] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: If CCP will make these special ingame items available for merely hundredth of fraction of the initial "tied-in" arrangements or the costs,. The Shirt cost nothing. You got a discount on the PLEX, so really CCP paid you to take the shirt. But we'll round the price of the shirt up to Free for the sake of argument. CCP then made that Free item available for much more than its initial price of Free. This made you angry because you got something that other people will now have to pay for for Free...
Once you understand basic concepts of finance, you will understand my arguments.
And please tell me. So you think if CCP does rule in favor of your arguments, then are you telling me that it has absolutely no impact on the future of similar marketing promotions? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:40:00 -
[178] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Anybody not smart enough to drop $900 on 3 pixel shirts is dumb and doesn't understand basic finance.
Everybody value things differently.
Everybody have different level of disposable income.
I would like to believe that our conflict of interests derive from the fact we value things differently. Don't make me think that latter is the reason why you disagree. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 01:35:00 -
[179] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Why does the OP have two blocks of butter on his shoulders? LOL that's stupid.
Awesome job with trolling, throwing nonsensical posting that is completely irrelevant to the issues discussed here. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 02:57:00 -
[180] - Quote
ReptilesBlade wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Why does the OP have two blocks of butter on his shoulders? LOL that's stupid. Awesome job with trolling, throwing nonsensical posting that is completely irrelevant to the issues discussed here. Actually now that she mentions it it does look like you got a lot of butter on your shirt. Or maybe even margarine, the fake butter. Yeah, fake butter would definitely look a lot better on a fake shirt. Look CCP I could design fashion for you too!
Continue on with trolling. This thread definitely needs more bumping so that it could remain on the top of the forum. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 03:27:00 -
[181] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:The only person trolling here is you with your laughable concerns. I on the other hand simply made a relevant observation.
CCP devs disagree with you.
Continue trolling and bumping this thread! Much appreciated! |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
540
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 12:58:00 -
[182] - Quote
Hello CCP Devs, I hope that you guys rae having a fantastic weekend. Could you guys kindly take a look at the questions that we've asked and provide us with appropriate responses before steam-rolling the changes? We have been waiting for four weeks. All this waiting is getting quite displeasing. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
541
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 15:32:00 -
[183] - Quote
It's been a month.
        |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
541
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 06:47:00 -
[184] - Quote
It's been a month since this mess-up. CCP devs, could you please kindly take a look at the list of questions we compiled, and provide us with a status update? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
541
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 07:02:00 -
[185] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:It's been a month since this mess-up. CCP devs, could you please kindly take a look at the list of questions we compiled, and provide us with a status update? Just let it be a sour lesson that you paid $230 for dressing your (actually theirs) toon in their property and HTFU.
Collecting random weird geeky stuff on EVE is my chosen profession in EVE Online. I need a clear answer from CCP so I know what to do when the next similar promotions are available in the future. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
542
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 08:45:00 -
[186] - Quote
Still waiting for responses that were promised to us from CCP Devs several weeks ago. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
542
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 16:07:00 -
[187] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Ok so this issue with the Nex shirt will be resolved in the next release. Summer in CCP is when a lot of staff take vacation so finding the right people to finalize this issue takes more time than normal. To make this clear and unambiguous, this post is likely to be long. History of the Nex shirtSo we had a special PLEX bundle in October 2011 which offered an GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ as part of the package. Since disclosing how many of these bundles we sell is not company policy, I will simply say it was GÇÿseveral hundred playersGÇÖ who took up this offer. At this stage I will also address that a second offer was released with the Russian CollectorGÇÖs edition which offered a special jacket. These two cases are different and will be addressed separately later on. Inferno 1.1
With the Inferno 1.1 release we added multiple new items to the Nex store and the GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ was added in error. Once again, GÇÿseveral hundred playersGÇÖ bought the shirt which was meant to be an exclusive item. Once it came to our attention that the GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ was added by accident, we disabled the sale of this item while we decided what to do. Replacement itemTeam Avatar, the team responsible for all Nex store items, decided to create a new item called the GÇÿField Marshall CoatGÇÖ (please note that this is a brand new item and not currently listed in the Nex store) and would award this to the pilots who should have had the original exclusive GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ. Deciding who should get the shirt was a difficult task as not all shirts remained with the original owner. It was decided that the GÇÿField Marshall CoatGÇÖ would be awarded as follows: If I was a player who took up the PLEX offer, or multiple instances of the PLEX offer, and retained the original GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ, I will automatically receive the new GÇÿField Marshall CoatGÇÖ on all accounts that purchased it or will receive multiple coats if purchased over multiple accounts. Therefore, if I bought 3 x PLEX offer I will receive three GÇÿField Marshall CoatsGÇÖ If I was a player who took up the PLEX offer and sold the GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ to Player B, Player B will receive the new GÇÿField Marshall CoatGÇÖ If I was Player B who sold the shirt on again to Player c, Player C will receive the new GÇÿField Marshall CoatGÇÖ And so on until the shirt is with the player who deserves to own it. The basis of this decision is that, if you sold your GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ, then you cashed out and the player buying it has invested in that exclusivity instead. Deployment of replacement itemThe new GÇÿField Marshall CoatGÇÖ has had a new item description added from the content team and requires a deployment cycle before it can be issued. The next deployment cycle is Wednesday, August 8 for Inferno 1.2 and the coat will be assigned to the redeeming system of the pilots in question. If you feel you should have got a coat and one was not assigned, you will need to submit a petition for a Game Master to investigate. Once this deployment is complete, we will sell the GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ in the store as normal. It will cease to be an exclusive item. Russian CollectorGÇÖs EditionThere will be no change to the Russian CollectorGÇÖs Edition jacket as there are currently in excess of 3,000 box copies in circulation. This item was a giveaway with that box and many more will come in to circulation as players pick up that box set. The number of additional jackets sold before we removed them from the Nex store was exceptionally low and there is no logical or easy way to make this item more exclusive. It simply will have more jackets added over time and that is by design. I sincerely hope that this clears up the matter. Many members of Team Avatar are still on vacation so if there are any questions it may take some time until they get answered
Thank you very much for the detailed response. You are king among men. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
542
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 16:58:00 -
[188] - Quote
Also, is there going to be controls in place so that this kind of issues does not repeat again? Controls that prevent other promotional items that were marked as "limited/one-time-offer/limited edition" from being reissued? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
542
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 17:24:00 -
[189] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Also, is there going to be controls in place so that this kind of issues does not repeat again? Controls that prevent other promotional items that were marked as "limited/one-time-offer/limited edition" from being reissued? Yes, that has already taken place.
Thank you very much. Those controls will definitely increase the likelihood of cash spenders participating in the future promotions. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
542
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 17:31:00 -
[190] - Quote
hedge betts Shiyurida wrote:How the f@*k is the thread 32 pages long.
CCP made a t-shirt as part of a plex offer. They made to many and not enough people took up the offer.
In order to get rid of stock taking up space. They discount id get rid. Nit that hard to figure out.shops do it all the time.
Got to a music shop and you will see the cd/ DVD you paid 10.99 for on.sale for half that a few months later.
Why
Same as above. They have to make room for new stock they can sell at a higher mark up.
I've actually lost some respect for ccp , for giving into you winggy turds.
And Mr Epeen is right. You seriously need to retouch on accounting studies and the concept of inventory management. |
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
545
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 19:13:00 -
[191] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Perhaps I've missed an implication somewhere in the course of this thread but after reviewing the dev posts I've been unable to find any clear statement as to the fate of the nex offer for the Ishukone shirt. If it has been stated and I've missed it then I apologize but would be appreciative of anyone pointing me in the right direction for confirmation.
If it hasn't been clearly stated then I'd like to ask directly: Will the Ishukone shirt offer in the Nex store be returning in Inferno 1.2?
Kinda liked the shirt and missed out. Would like to know if I get a second chance. According to the previous post from CCP Navigator: Quote:Once this deployment is complete, we will sell the GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ in the store as normal. It will cease to be an exclusive item.
I am currently in possession of three "original" Ishukone shirts. Do I have to keep those until the date of the next patch in order to receive the Field Marshal Coat? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
565
|
Posted - 2012.08.08 15:19:00 -
[192] - Quote
CCP Bayesian wrote:iskflakes wrote:"The new GÇÿField Marshall CoatGÇÖ has had a new item description added from the content team and requires a deployment cycle before it can be issued. The next deployment cycle is Wednesday, August 8 for Inferno 1.2"
Were the changes deployed in Inferno 1.2 as planned?
"Once this deployment is complete, we will sell the GÇÿIshukone shirtGÇÖ in the store as normal."
I do not see the ishukone shirt in the store. The changes were deployed as planned so all those eligible for the replacement Field Marshall Coat should be able to redeem it. If you think you should be eligible but haven't received anything then please post here and raise a GM petition. Edit: The Ishukone Shirt will make it onto the store once we've made sure all those who are eligible to get the replacement item get one. The deployment mentioned in the quote is that of the replacement item not the latest version of EVE.
Thank you for your help!
I assume if I was suppose to get three, but only received two, I can petition GM to receive the remaining new Field Marshall Coat? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
565
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 06:45:00 -
[193] - Quote
Rikula wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: Thank you for your help!
I assume if I was suppose to get three, but only received two, I can petition GM to receive the remaining new Field Marshall Coat?
I likewise did not receive what I was supposed to. I wonder if this was a miscalculation. I had some Ishukone's from before the mistake patch, which I have kept untouched. I also purchased two during the mistake patch deployment from some enterprising individual buying 100AU shirts and selling them to me for a few hundred. Those two new shirts I sold recently, but have kept the originals. I am wondering if the system deducted those two I sold from my tally of how many Coats I am owed. And if that's the case, does this mean that someone else has been given my coats? I have created a petition myself, but past petitions take 7+ days, so I don't expect to hear back for a while. Edit: I am very pleased with the look of the coat and such. Definitely an acceptable replacement!
And the description of the new Marshall Coat is amazing!
I filed for petition as well. Hopefully we get to hear soon. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
565
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 09:38:00 -
[194] - Quote
Thank you, CCP Bayesian and CCP Navigator. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
566
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 16:04:00 -
[195] - Quote
CCP Bayesian wrote:An update for you all. With the reported info above I went off and spoke to the people who setup the redeeming. We made a very slight booboo in the initial redeeming offer in that the people who were supposed to get more than one coat to replace their shirts have only been sent one. This was entirely my fault for not being explicit enough in the instructions of what we need to do.
*hangs head in shame*
Good news is that as I'm typing this we're sending the affected players a new redeeming token for their remaining coats if they've already claimed the first one. If you've not claimed the redeeming token yet then we've updated the existing token to provide the correct number of coats.
Apologies for the **** up you may now commence the flaming!
You are king among men. Thank you. |
|
|
|